Planetary Dialogue SDDP on Obama's Vision: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:


==Triggering Question==
==Triggering Question==
In the context of Obama's vision for engaging stakeholders from all walks of life in a bottom-up democracy employing Internet technology, what factors do we anticipate, on the basis of our experiences with SDDP, will emerge as inhibitors to the actualization of his vision?
'''"In the context of Obama's vision for engaging stakeholders from all walks of life in a bottom-up democracy employing Internet technology, what factors do we anticipate, on the basis of our experiences with SDDP, will emerge as inhibitors to the actualization of his vision?"'''
 


In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 59 ideas, which were categorized in 13 clusters. Following the voting process, 41 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 59 ideas, which were categorized in 13 clusters. Following the voting process, 41 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>


<br>
<br>
[[File:|thumb|center|upright=4.0|alt=MAP for Obama Vision.|Influence tree from the ideas generated at Obama Vision SDDP  workshop for TQ.]]
[[File:Obamavision sddp map.png|thumb|center|upright=4.0|alt=MAP for Obama Vision.|Influence tree from the ideas generated at Obama Vision SDDP  workshop for TQ.]]
<br>
 
<br>
[[File:Finders_PlanetaryDialogue_2006_ListofFactors.pdf|thumb|center|upright=4.0|alt=MAP for Obama Vision.|"What factors will help significantly in rescuing the enlightent from its failings?"
<br>
<br>


According to the participants of this workshop, the ideas that appear to be the most influential were: <br>
According to the participants of this workshop, the ideas that appear to be the most influential were: <br>
 
* INHIBITOR #2: RISK OF EXCLUDING DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE <br>
* INHIBITOR #8: TECHNICAL TECHNOLOGICAL EXCLUSION <br>
* INHIBITOR #14: INSUFFICIENT ATTENTION GIVEN TO FACILITATOR CAPACITATION <br>
* INHIBITOR #18: SCALABILITY OF DISCUSSION TECHNOLOGY <br>
* INHIBITOR #23: SOCIAL CONTRACT OVERLOAD <br>




Line 45: Line 44:




In sum, the dialogue made it possible for the participants to imagine and describe a collective understanding of the complex situation (Problematique) facing the Obama administration in their vision of realizing bottom-up democracy in the USA, and maybe other parts of the planet.<br>
In sum, the dialogue made it possible for the participants to imagine and describe a collective understanding of the complex situation (Problematique) facing the Obama administration in their vision of realizing bottom-up democracy in the USA, and maybe other parts of the planet.<br>


==Facilitators==
==Facilitators==

Navigation menu