Virtual SDDP MedBEESinessHubs 2022: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with " HERE TH DATA OF THE VIRTUAL SDDP WE CONDUCTED WITH THIS GROUP")
 
(Page created)
Line 1: Line 1:


{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->
  |acronym=SDDP MedBEESinessHubs 2022                    <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
|book_image=    <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the content-->
|report_title=Mechanisms that ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services
|Triggering_Question= What are descriptors/characteristics of an ideal sustainable responsible development in our rural areas that secure prosperity for all local people?
|project=[[MedBEESinessHubs]]
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]]
|editor= [[Camille Lechoux]]
|total_duration=2 days
|stats=Participants=18 <br> Number of ideas=69  <br>Number of Clusters=10 <br> Ideas received Votes= 36 <br> Ideas on MAP R= 13
|dates= Feb - May 2022 virtual (zoom)
28th - 29th June 2022
|link=
}}


HERE TH DATA OF THE VIRTUAL SDDP WE CONDUCTED WITH THIS GROUP
 
==Executive Summary==
This report has been developed in the context of the [[MedBEESinessHubs]] project. It is the result of two Structured Democratic Dialogues (SDDs) in Cyprus between March and June 2022. The aim of the activities was to train representatives from the participating countries on how to apply SDDs to address local challenges in their respective rural communities.
 
The first part of the SDD training took place between May and June 2022. It was organized as a sequence of 5 weekly Zoom meetings. The Triggering Question was: “In the context of your work, what are obstacles that prevent efficient stakeholders’ dialogues?” The participants produced 35 ideas, which were clustered in 6 categories. After voting for their top 5, 17 ideas received votes (indicating Spreathink = 40%), and 7 were structured. The following ideas made it to the root of the tree: #3: (9 Votes) Lack/absence of a clear common goal for the group to work on; #2: (7 Votes) Moderator/facilitator; #5: (4 Votes) Inconsistency and incompatibility between group members (age, educational level and experience, etc.): #20: (4 Votes) Conflict of interest; #13: (3 Votes) Not knowing the contents of the topics well; #35: (3 Votes) Some members might not have the appropriate knowledge and the skills for stakeholders’ dialogue; and #1: (1 Votes) Logistical arrangements. The striking finding is that the group identified #2: Moderator/facilitator, as the most influential factor.
 
The second part of the training took place face-to-face in Cyprus between 28-29 june. It was hosted by the Cyprus Chamber of Commerce. The Triggering Question  was: “What are descriptors/ characteristics of an ideal sustainable responsible development in our rural areas that secure prosperity for all local people?” The participants produced 69 responses, which were clustered in 10 categories. Following the selection of their top 5, 36 ideas ideas received votes (indicating Spreadthink = 48%), and 13 were structured. At the root of the tree, they had: #4: Well-designed sustainable business model; #14: Fair policies and budget; and #21: Creating cooperation with producers and all stakeholders.
 
 
==Participants==
 
{|border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="left"
|-
! scope="col" style="background:#efefef;" align="left"| Name
|-
|Abdalaziz, Al-Salhi
|-
|Amal, Wehaibe
|-
|Amr, Daoud
|-
|Androulla, Xenophontos
|-
|Ayed, Abdel Aziz
|-
|Christos, Tanteles
|-
|Demetra, Palaonda
|-
|Elia, Wehbe
|-
|Evi, Kazamia
|-
|Fady, Abou Fayad
|-
|Fransesco, Bachis
|-
|Geogia, Venizelou
|-
|Greca, N.Meloni
|-
|Khaldoon, El Hassanieh
|-
|Luigi, Manias
|-
|Mai, Darwish
|-
|Merna, Ziadeh
|-
|Noni, Demetroula
|-
|Noor, Alzaben
|-
|Osama Mourise
|-
|Said, Gedeon
|-
|Samra, Raconcic
|-
|Savvas, Maliotis
|-
|Yiannis, Laouris
|-
|Marios, Michaelides
|-
|Camille, Lechoux
|-
|Manon, Coussemacker
|-
|France, De Borggraeve
|}
 
 
 
 
[[Category:Future Worlds Center Projects]]
[[Category:Projects with SDD]]

Revision as of 02:56, 19 July 2022

SDDP MedBEESinessHubs 2022
Report Title Mechanisms that ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services
Project MedBEESinessHubs
Triggering Question What are descriptors/characteristics of an ideal sustainable responsible development in our rural areas that secure prosperity for all local people?
Dates Feb - May 2022 virtual (zoom)

28th - 29th June 2022

Author(s) Yiannis Laouris
Editor(s) Camille Lechoux
Total Duration 2 days
Statistics Participants=18
Number of ideas=69
Number of Clusters=10
Ideas received Votes= 36
Ideas on MAP R= 13



Executive Summary

This report has been developed in the context of the MedBEESinessHubs project. It is the result of two Structured Democratic Dialogues (SDDs) in Cyprus between March and June 2022. The aim of the activities was to train representatives from the participating countries on how to apply SDDs to address local challenges in their respective rural communities.

The first part of the SDD training took place between May and June 2022. It was organized as a sequence of 5 weekly Zoom meetings. The Triggering Question was: “In the context of your work, what are obstacles that prevent efficient stakeholders’ dialogues?” The participants produced 35 ideas, which were clustered in 6 categories. After voting for their top 5, 17 ideas received votes (indicating Spreathink = 40%), and 7 were structured. The following ideas made it to the root of the tree: #3: (9 Votes) Lack/absence of a clear common goal for the group to work on; #2: (7 Votes) Moderator/facilitator; #5: (4 Votes) Inconsistency and incompatibility between group members (age, educational level and experience, etc.): #20: (4 Votes) Conflict of interest; #13: (3 Votes) Not knowing the contents of the topics well; #35: (3 Votes) Some members might not have the appropriate knowledge and the skills for stakeholders’ dialogue; and #1: (1 Votes) Logistical arrangements. The striking finding is that the group identified #2: Moderator/facilitator, as the most influential factor.

The second part of the training took place face-to-face in Cyprus between 28-29 june. It was hosted by the Cyprus Chamber of Commerce. The Triggering Question was: “What are descriptors/ characteristics of an ideal sustainable responsible development in our rural areas that secure prosperity for all local people?” The participants produced 69 responses, which were clustered in 10 categories. Following the selection of their top 5, 36 ideas ideas received votes (indicating Spreadthink = 48%), and 13 were structured. At the root of the tree, they had: #4: Well-designed sustainable business model; #14: Fair policies and budget; and #21: Creating cooperation with producers and all stakeholders.


Participants

Name
Abdalaziz, Al-Salhi
Amal, Wehaibe
Amr, Daoud
Androulla, Xenophontos
Ayed, Abdel Aziz
Christos, Tanteles
Demetra, Palaonda
Elia, Wehbe
Evi, Kazamia
Fady, Abou Fayad
Fransesco, Bachis
Geogia, Venizelou
Greca, N.Meloni
Khaldoon, El Hassanieh
Luigi, Manias
Mai, Darwish
Merna, Ziadeh
Noni, Demetroula
Noor, Alzaben
Osama Mourise
Said, Gedeon
Samra, Raconcic
Savvas, Maliotis
Yiannis, Laouris
Marios, Michaelides
Camille, Lechoux
Manon, Coussemacker
France, De Borggraeve
Retrieved from "https://futureworlds.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Virtual_SDDP_MedBEESinessHubs_2022&oldid=25949"