Difference between revisions of "SDDP Akamas 2017 - Vision"

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{SDD_Report |acronym= SDDP Akamas 2017 |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the appropriate content--> |report_title=...")
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{SDD_Report
 
{{SDD_Report
 
|acronym= SDDP Akamas 2017
 
|acronym= SDDP Akamas 2017
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg     <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the appropriate content-->
+
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg
|report_title= [[Εργαστήριο για τη σύνθεση οράματος για τη χερσόνησο του Ακάμα]]
+
|report_title= Εργαστήριο για τη σύνθεση οράματος για τη χερσόνησο του Ακάμα
 
|LeadFacilitator=[[Yiannis Laouris]]
 
|LeadFacilitator=[[Yiannis Laouris]]
|AsFacilitator=[[Nicoletta Jiorzi]]
+
|AsFacilitator=[[Nicoleta Jiorzi]]
 
|Triggering_Question= What are the objectives, the achievement of which will lead to the best possible utilization of the area of ​​the Local Plan, taking into account the peculiarities of the Akamas Peninsula?<br>GR:Ποιοί είναι οι στόχοι, που η επίτευξή τους θα οδηγήσει στην καλύτερη δυνατή αξιοποίηση της περιοχής του Τοπικού Σχεδίου, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη τις ιδιαιτερότητες της Χερσονήσου του Ακάμα;  
 
|Triggering_Question= What are the objectives, the achievement of which will lead to the best possible utilization of the area of ​​the Local Plan, taking into account the peculiarities of the Akamas Peninsula?<br>GR:Ποιοί είναι οι στόχοι, που η επίτευξή τους θα οδηγήσει στην καλύτερη δυνατή αξιοποίηση της περιοχής του Τοπικού Σχεδίου, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη τις ιδιαιτερότητες της Χερσονήσου του Ακάμα;  
 
|project=[[CAPA Projects]]
 
|project=[[CAPA Projects]]
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|editor=   
 
|editor=   
 
|total_duration=12 person hrs
 
|total_duration=12 person hrs
|stats=Participants=22 <br> Number of ideas=75 <br>Number of Clusters=12 <br> Ideas received Votes=49 <br> Ideas on MAP R=11 <br>Spreathink  ST=62,8%  <br>Situational Complexity  SCI=4,21
+
|stats=Participants=22?? <br> Number of ideas=69 <br>Number of Clusters=13 <br> Ideas received Votes=39 <br> Ideas on MAP R=18 <br>Spreathink  ST=63%  <br>Situational Complexity  SCI=5.06
 
|dates=21-22/03/2017
 
|dates=21-22/03/2017
 
|link=[[]]
 
|link=[[]]
 
}}
 
}}
  
The '''TAX - VAT Merging: 1st SDDP''' [[Structured Democratic Dialogue Process]] has been conducted in the context of the ad hoc [[Merging of TAX - VAT Services in Cyprus]] project.
+
The '''SDDP Akamas 2017 - Vision''' [[Structured Democratic Dialogue Process]] has been conducted on a contract by the [[Cyprus Academy of Public Administration]] to address the major conflicts between stakeholders of the Akama peninsula.
  
 
==Executive Summary==
 
==Executive Summary==
  
During the period 7-19 November, the project team , in collaboration with the [[Cyprus Academy of Public Administration]] ( CAPA ), conducted three consultation meetings - workshops with all interested stakeholders in-order to analyze the smooth transition of merging the Services provided by the Department of Inland Revenue (i.e., TAX) and the Value Added Tax Services (VAT). The aim of the first [[Structured Democratic Dialogue Process|SDDP]] workshop was to identify the '''Challenges''' that people and organizational structured would face during this transition.
+
A few weeks earlier, the project team, in collaboration with [[Marios Michaelides]] and his colleagues at the [[Cyprus Academy of Public Administration]], conducted consultation meetings - workshops with all interested stakeholders in-order to analyze
 +
 
  
 
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) of the first workshop was: </u><br>
 
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) of the first workshop was: </u><br>
  
'''"What are the challenges that should be addressed for the successful merging of TAX and VAT deparments?"'''
+
'''What are the objectives, the achievement of which will lead to the best possible utilization of the area of ​​the Local Plan, taking into account the peculiarities of the Akamas Peninsula?"<br><br>GR:"Ποιοί είναι οι στόχοι, που η επίτευξή τους θα οδηγήσει στην καλύτερη δυνατή αξιοποίηση της περιοχής του Τοπικού Σχεδίου, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη τις ιδιαιτερότητες της Χερσονήσου του Ακάμα;" '''
  
In response to the TQ, the 24 participants came up with 75 challenges, which were categorized in 12 clusters. Following the voting process, 49 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
+
In response to the TQ, the 24? participants came up with 69 statements, which were categorized in 13 clusters. Following the voting process, 39 ideas received one or more votes. 18 were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
[[File:TAX_image_VAT_Merging__1st_SDDP.png|Influence tree from the challenges SDDP of the  TAX - VAT Merging workshop for TQ.|700px]]
+
[[File: Akamas_SDDP_20170320_MAP.jpg|Influence tree|650px]]
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
  
According to the participants of this workshop, the challenges that appear to be the most influential were: <br>
+
According to the participants of this workshop, the targets that appear to be the most influential were: <br>
* Challenge #4: Νέο Μηχανογραφικό Σύστημα για τον ενοποιημένο οργανισμό<br>
+
* 1: Integrated spatial planning
* Challenge #21: Επιμόρφωση στελεχών στη νέα υπηρεσία.<br>
+
* 21: Unified and integrated urban and spatial planning of the Akama Peninsula
* Challenge #5: Κοινή πλατφόρμα πληροφοριών.<br>
+
* 22: Creation of infrastructure projects in the communities of the area as compensation
* Challenge #8: Εξασφάλιση και στελέχωση προσωπικού.<br>
+
* 40: Quantified sustainability indicators and implementation of the action plan
* Challenge #14:Δημιουργία κοινής κουλτούρας.<br>
+
* 42: Fair and equal treatment of landowners
* Challenge #29: Στρατηγικό σχέδιο του νέου οργανισμού.<br>
 
* Challenge #2: Διαφανής διαδικασίες στη διαδκασία συνένωσης των δύο τμημάτων.<br>
 
* Challenge #11: Εμπλοκή κλαδικών συμβουλιών και ΠΑΣΥΔΥ.<br>
 
* Challenge #7: Δομή του νέου σχήματος.<br>
 
 
 
 
 
  
 +
GREEK Original Statements
 +
* 1: Ολοκληρωμένος χωρικός σχεδιασμός
 +
* 21: Ενιαίος και ολοκληρωμένος πολεοδομικός και χωροταξικός σχεδιασμός της χερσονήσου Ακάμα
 +
* 22: Δημιουργία έργων υποδομής στις κοινότητες της περιοχής σαν αντιστάθμισμα
 +
* 40: Ποσοτικοποιημένοι δείκτες αειφορίας και εφαρμογή του σχεδίου δράσης
 +
* 42: Δίκαιη ΚΑΙ ισότιμη μεταχείρηση των ιδιοκτητών γής
  
The workshop was mainly facilitated by [[Marios Michaelides]] and [[Yiannis Laouris]].
+
The workshop was facilitated by [[Yiannis Laouris]] and [[Nicoleta Jiorzi]] under the monitoring of [[Marios Michaelides]].
In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported their satisfaction that they had the opportunity to exchange ideas regarding the challenges and got engaged for the follow-up workshop to define the expectations.<br>
+
The atmosphere of this gathering was extremely tense and explosive. It has been probably the first time ever that the whole spectrum of stakeholders was placed in the same room for such a long time and permitted to deliberate. At the completion of the process, the participants reported their satisfaction especially because they had the opportunity to communicate their ideas and objections to those with opposite positions and interests. They reported that the exchange of ideas regarding a positive evolution of the Akamas peninsula took place in an environment of respect and understanding regarding each side's interests and wishes. The actual problem has not yet been resolved even a few years later. The various stakeholder groups, i.e., the government, the land and tourism developers, the environmentalists, and of course the locals continue to attempt to promote their group's interests not in holistic manner and in disrespect of the discovery of the root factors, i.e., Integrated spatial planning,
 +
and  Unified and integrated urban and spatial planning of the Akama Peninsula. At the same time, their joint discovery of these root factors has equipped every group with the understanding that progress cannot be made until these two factors are truly addressed by all; thus the delay!
  
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
 
+
WALL
  
 
[[Category:Future Worlds Center Projects]]
 
[[Category:Future Worlds Center Projects]]
 
[[Category:Projects with SDD]]
 
[[Category:Projects with SDD]]

Latest revision as of 08:50, 27 September 2020

SDDP Akamas 2017
SDDP Akamas 2017
Report Title Εργαστήριο για τη σύνθεση οράματος για τη χερσόνησο του Ακάμα
Project CAPA Projects
Triggering Question What are the objectives, the achievement of which will lead to the best possible utilization of the area of ​​the Local Plan, taking into account the peculiarities of the Akamas Peninsula?
GR:Ποιοί είναι οι στόχοι, που η επίτευξή τους θα οδηγήσει στην καλύτερη δυνατή αξιοποίηση της περιοχής του Τοπικού Σχεδίου, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη τις ιδιαιτερότητες της Χερσονήσου του Ακάμα;
Dates 21-22/03/2017
Lead Facilitator(s) Yiannis Laouris
Assistant Facilitator(s) Nicoleta Jiorzi
Author(s) Yiannis Laouris
Marios Michaelides
Total Duration 12 person hrs
Statistics Participants=22??
Number of ideas=69
Number of Clusters=13
Ideas received Votes=39
Ideas on MAP R=18
Spreathink ST=63%
Situational Complexity SCI=5.06
Download [[]]



The SDDP Akamas 2017 - Vision Structured Democratic Dialogue Process has been conducted on a contract by the Cyprus Academy of Public Administration to address the major conflicts between stakeholders of the Akama peninsula.

Executive Summary

A few weeks earlier, the project team, in collaboration with Marios Michaelides and his colleagues at the Cyprus Academy of Public Administration, conducted consultation meetings - workshops with all interested stakeholders in-order to analyze


The Triggering Question (TQ) of the first workshop was:

What are the objectives, the achievement of which will lead to the best possible utilization of the area of ​​the Local Plan, taking into account the peculiarities of the Akamas Peninsula?"

GR:"Ποιοί είναι οι στόχοι, που η επίτευξή τους θα οδηγήσει στην καλύτερη δυνατή αξιοποίηση της περιοχής του Τοπικού Σχεδίου, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη τις ιδιαιτερότητες της Χερσονήσου του Ακάμα;"

In response to the TQ, the 24? participants came up with 69 statements, which were categorized in 13 clusters. Following the voting process, 39 ideas received one or more votes. 18 were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.


Influence tree

According to the participants of this workshop, the targets that appear to be the most influential were:

  • 1: Integrated spatial planning
  • 21: Unified and integrated urban and spatial planning of the Akama Peninsula
  • 22: Creation of infrastructure projects in the communities of the area as compensation
  • 40: Quantified sustainability indicators and implementation of the action plan
  • 42: Fair and equal treatment of landowners

GREEK Original Statements

  • 1: Ολοκληρωμένος χωρικός σχεδιασμός
  • 21: Ενιαίος και ολοκληρωμένος πολεοδομικός και χωροταξικός σχεδιασμός της χερσονήσου Ακάμα
  • 22: Δημιουργία έργων υποδομής στις κοινότητες της περιοχής σαν αντιστάθμισμα
  • 40: Ποσοτικοποιημένοι δείκτες αειφορίας και εφαρμογή του σχεδίου δράσης
  • 42: Δίκαιη ΚΑΙ ισότιμη μεταχείρηση των ιδιοκτητών γής

The workshop was facilitated by Yiannis Laouris and Nicoleta Jiorzi under the monitoring of Marios Michaelides. The atmosphere of this gathering was extremely tense and explosive. It has been probably the first time ever that the whole spectrum of stakeholders was placed in the same room for such a long time and permitted to deliberate. At the completion of the process, the participants reported their satisfaction especially because they had the opportunity to communicate their ideas and objections to those with opposite positions and interests. They reported that the exchange of ideas regarding a positive evolution of the Akamas peninsula took place in an environment of respect and understanding regarding each side's interests and wishes. The actual problem has not yet been resolved even a few years later. The various stakeholder groups, i.e., the government, the land and tourism developers, the environmentalists, and of course the locals continue to attempt to promote their group's interests not in holistic manner and in disrespect of the discovery of the root factors, i.e., Integrated spatial planning, and Unified and integrated urban and spatial planning of the Akama Peninsula. At the same time, their joint discovery of these root factors has equipped every group with the understanding that progress cannot be made until these two factors are truly addressed by all; thus the delay!

External Links

WALL