155
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|contract_number= | |contract_number= | ||
|funding_period=2006-2008 | |funding_period=2006-2008 | ||
|coordinator=[[ | |coordinator=[[Ilke Dagli]]]<br>[[Tatjana Taraszow]] | ||
|funding_agency= | |funding_agency=UNDP-ACT | ||
|total_cost= | |total_cost= | ||
|partners=Coordinator: [[Cyprus EU Association]]<br> [[Cyprus Intercultural Training Initiative]]<br>[[Institute of 21st Century Agoras]] | |partners=Coordinator: [[Cyprus EU Association]]<br>[[Cyprus Intercultural Training Initiative]]<br>[[Institute of 21st Century Agoras]] | ||
|website=http://www.CivilSocietyDialogue.info | |website=http://blogora.wetpaint.com/page/Cyprus+Civil+Society+Dialogue?t=anon <br> http://www.CivilSocietyDialogue.info | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Civil Society Dialogue''' project was envisioned, designed and implemented by Cypriot peace pioneers, mainly members of the [[Cyprus Conflict Resolution Trainers Group]] following the negative outcome of the referendum in 2004. The project brought together civil society organisations from both sides of the island to share experiences and work to create a Citizens’ Platform where ideas are discussed and an Action Plan is devised to build the new reunited Cyprus. Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot citizens having years of bi-communal experience will come together with | The '''Civil Society Dialogue''' project was envisioned, designed and implemented by Cypriot peace pioneers, mainly members of the [[Cyprus Conflict Resolution Trainers Group]] following the negative outcome of the referendum in 2004. The project brought together civil society organisations from both sides of the island to share experiences and work to create a Citizens’ Platform where ideas are discussed and an Action Plan is devised to build the new reunited Cyprus. Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot citizens having years of bi-communal experience will come together with other less experienced but young, well educated and motivated individuals to share experiences and ideas as well as to generate their vision of the island. | ||
The project was managed by | The project was managed by [[Cyprus EU Association]], which is headed by [[Ali Erel]], in collaboration with [[Cyprus Intercultural Training Initiative]] (CITI), which is a body of facilitators created by members of the [[Cyprus Conflict Resolution Trainers Group]], and [[Institute of 21st Century Agoras]], the international body of [[Structured Democratic Dialogue Process]] scientists and practitioners. [[Cyprus EU Association]] assigned [[Derya Beyatli]] as overall project manager and [[Ilke Dagli]] as project coordinator for the implementation of all project activities. [[Cyprus Intercultural Training Initiative]] assigned [[Tatjana Taraszow]] as assistant project coordinator, especially responsible for the organization, implementation, and dissemination of project activities in the southern part of Cyprus. [[Yiannis Laouris]] and [[Marios Michaelides]] from [[CITI]] assumed the role as main Structured Democratic Dialogue facilitators together with [[Aleco Christakis]] from [[Institute of 21st Century Agoras]]. | ||
A series of Structured Democratic Dialogue Process co-laboratories (workshops), seminars and other public events were implemented throughout the project's duration. | |||
==Structured Dialogues== | ==Structured Dialogues== | ||
===Structured dialogues aiming at the ''revival of the peace process''=== | |||
The first dialogue aimed at the diagnosis of the problématique. | |||
Dates: 20th October, 28th November, 28th December 2006 | |||
Venue: Cyprus EU Association, Nicosia | |||
Using the Structured Dialogic Design Process as methodology in the co-laboratories, the participants were asked the following triggering question: | |||
“What Factors contribute to the widening gap between the two communities in Cyprus?” | |||
Different ideas were generated by participants contributing from different backgrounds and perspectives, then clustered and prioritized. Prioritization took place by voting, then the ideas that received the most votes were selected and explored further and the relationship between the factors was discussed. Finally, the participants came up with a root cause map indicating the underlying causes for the widening gap between the two sides. | |||
The second dialogue aimed at the identification of goals and opportunities. | |||
Dates: | Dates: 10th-11th March 2007 | ||
Venue: Forest Park Hotel, Platres | Venue: Forest Park Hotel, Platres | ||
Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
“In the context of the overall objective of bridging the gap between the two communities: What short- to medium term goals in your opinion if achieved would contribute significantly to the above objective?” | “In the context of the overall objective of bridging the gap between the two communities: What short- to medium term goals in your opinion if achieved would contribute significantly to the above objective?” | ||
Participants met in Forest Park Hotel over the weekend spending 12 hours together for the residential co-laboratory. Once again, idea generation, clustering and | Participants met in Forest Park Hotel over the weekend spending 12 hours together for the residential co-laboratory. Once again, idea generation, clustering and prioritization took place. The ideas that received the most votes were selected and explored further where the relationship between the ideas was discussed. Finally, the participants came up with a root cause map portraying the goals and opportunities which can be utilized for bridging the gap between the two sides. | ||
===Structured dialogues to study Economic Integration=== | ===Structured dialogues to study Economic Integration=== | ||
Dates: 3rd July | The third dialogue aimed at Economic Integration in Cyprus. | ||
Venues: Holiday Inn, Saray Hotel, Fulbright Centre | Dates: 3rd July, 10th July, 27th July 2007 | ||
Venues: Holiday Inn, Saray Hotel, Fulbright Centre, Nicosia | |||
Using the same process, the participants were asked the three triggering questions in order to idealize the current situation, diagnose the problems and design an action plan: | Using the same process, the participants were asked the three triggering questions in order to idealize the current situation, diagnose the problems, and design an action plan: | ||
“With the aim of economic integration, what are the benefits (opportunities) for Cyprus, of free movement of goods and services within Cyprus and the EU?” | “With the aim of economic integration, what are the benefits (opportunities) for Cyprus, of free movement of goods and services within Cyprus and the EU?” | ||
Line 55: | Line 58: | ||
“With the aim of economic integration: what actions should be taken to overcome the obstacles and to reap the benefits in achieving free movement of goods and services?” | “With the aim of economic integration: what actions should be taken to overcome the obstacles and to reap the benefits in achieving free movement of goods and services?” | ||
Participants had three sessions of 3 hours where they generated ideas, voted and drew a root cause map for each particular triggering question. The results of the final session, which was dedicated for designing an action plan, was then used to develop 5 other project drafts | Participants had three sessions of 3 hours where they generated ideas, voted and drew a root cause map for each particular triggering question. The results of the final session, which was dedicated for designing an action plan, was then used to develop 5 other project drafts. Participants interpreted all the results and with the assistance of the facilitation team prepared a final report. | ||
===Structured dialogues aiming Famagusta Revival=== | |||
Dates: 10th November | ===Structured dialogues aiming at Famagusta Revival=== | ||
Venue: Venus Beach Hotel, Lordos Beach Hotel, Fulbright Centre | Dates: 10th November, 17th November, 4th December, 8th December 2007, 30th January 2008, 13th March 2008 | ||
Venue: Venus Beach Hotel, Famagusta; Lordos Beach Hotel, Larnaka; Fulbright Centre, Nicosia | |||
Using the SDD process, the participants were asked the three triggering questions in order to idealize the current situation, diagnose the problems and design an action plan: | Using the SDD process, the participants were asked the three triggering questions in order to idealize the current situation, diagnose the problems and design an action plan: | ||
Line 69: | Line 73: | ||
“What are action options, which if we adopt and implement, we will overcome the obstacles and achieve the ideal image of Famagusta/Varosha?” | “What are action options, which if we adopt and implement, we will overcome the obstacles and achieve the ideal image of Famagusta/Varosha?” | ||
Participants had six sessions of | Participants had six sessions of approximately 3-4 hours where they generated ideas, voted and designed root cause and influence maps for each particular triggering question. Participants interpreted all the results and with the assistance of the facilitation team prepared a final report. | ||
==Training of local SDDP Facilitators== | ==Training of local SDDP Facilitators== |
edits