SDDP Engaging citizens to reinvent democracy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
==Gallery== | |||
<gallery perrow="5"> | |||
File:Engaging citizensSDDP 1.jpg | |||
File:Engaging citizensSDDP 2.jpg | |||
File:Engaging citizensSDDP 3.jpg | |||
File:Engaging citizensSDDP 4.jpg | |||
File:Engaging citizensSDDP 5.jpg | |||
File:Engaging citizensSDDP 6.jpg | |||
File:Engaging citizensSDDP 7.jpg | |||
</gallery> | |||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
Revision as of 04:10, 8 November 2012
|
Executive Summary
The project “Engaging citizens to reinvent democracy" was born as an initiative of Future Worlds Center. The one-day workshop is organized as an interactive co-laboratory, fully utilizing up-to-date methodologies and technologies of the science of structured democratic dialogue. The aim of this co-laboratory is to bring together Cypriots of different age groups in an attempt to envision, conceptualize and design new models of democratic governance. The structured democratic dialogue methodology is a highly effective methodology that is employed for conflict resolution and which ensures that a variety of stakeholders represents the problem system of concern and that all stakeholders’ opinions are equally represented in the dialogic process. This project falls under the activities of the Cyprus Presidency. The workshop was facilitated by Dr. Yiannis Laouris,Zoe Apostolidou and Eleni Michail.
The Triggering Question (TQ) was
What are the characteristics of an ideal future system of governance?
In response to the TQ, the participants came up with 54 characteristics, which were categorized in 9 clusters. Following the voting process, 28 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.
According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristic appear to be the most influential was:
- Characteristic #26, Independent interactive media created by citizens for citizens
The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them.
In sum, the application of the SDDSM process empowered the team to identify the potential characteristics of an ideal future system of governance.
