Dialogic Design Science: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
===Foundation=== | ===Foundation=== | ||
Grounded on six [[Foundational Axioms of Dialogic Design Science]], seven [[Laws of Dialogic Design Science]] and [[Key Definitions used in Dialogic Design Science]]. | |||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
===Methodology=== | ===Methodology=== | ||
The [[Structured Democratic Dialogue Process]] is grounded on the theory and expects Facilitators to fully comply with all requirements imposed by [[Dialogic Design Science]]. | |||
=== Applications=== | |||
This is a [[[[SDDPs organized by Future Worlds Center|comprehensive list]] of all [[Co-Laboratory|Co-Laboratories]] organized by [[Future Worlds Center]]. | |||
[[Category:Dialogic Design Science]] | |||
Revision as of 01:09, 8 December 2017
Dialogic Design Science (DDS) is the theoretical foundation of the Structured Dialogic Design Process Methodology.
The ultimate objective of this People's Science is to support people from all walks of life for practicing authentic participative democracy by applying the Co-Laboratories of Democracy approach in designing or re-designing their social systems.
The Domain of Science Model (DOSM), proposed by Professor John N. Warfield in 1987, is being employed as the contextual typology for assigning the component artifacts of the DDS in the four distinct domains of the DOSM, namely:
Foundation
Grounded on six Foundational Axioms of Dialogic Design Science, seven Laws of Dialogic Design Science and Key Definitions used in Dialogic Design Science.
Theory
Methodology
The Structured Democratic Dialogue Process is grounded on the theory and expects Facilitators to fully comply with all requirements imposed by Dialogic Design Science.
Applications
This is a [[comprehensive list of all Co-Laboratories organized by Future Worlds Center.
