E-Hoop SDDP Germany: Difference between revisions

{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->

|acronym=E-Hoop SDDP Germany                     <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->

|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg     <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the appropriate content-->

|report_title= [[SDDP e-Hoop]] <!-- if a variable left empty e.g " report_title =" or not used  at all then it will not appear on the template -->

|Triggering_Question= "How can learners be supported to generate learning content"  

|project=[[E-Hoop]]

|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Chrystalla Miltiadou]]  

|editor=   

|total_duration=12 person hrs

|stats=Participants=13 <br> Number of ideas=69  <br>Number of Clusters=12 <br> Ideas received Votes=32  <br> Ideas on MAP R=8  <br>Spreathink  ST=44%  <br>Situational Complexity  SCI=1,2%  

|dates=11 October 2013

|link=[[http://www.e-hoop.info/]]

The Structured Dialogic Design co-laboratories are organized with aim to analyze the needs of the intended users with respect to their learning needs, as well as their needs with regards to the e-Hoop platform. The intention is to identify obstacles that prevent learners from benefiting maximally from their current educational institution due to differences (disabilities, socioeconomic background etc.), using the Structured Dialogic Design Process (SDDP).

New Technologies and Learning in Europe (NTL) organized on the 11th of October 2013 a co-laboratory in order to accumulate the collective wisdom of experts regarding the means that learners can be supported to generate learning content. The co-laboratory was attended by 13 international researchers, experts and decision makers.  

[[File:1st SDDP Tax-Vat Merg.png|thumb|center|upright=4.0|alt=MAP for 1st SDDP TAX - VAT Merging.|Influence tree from the challenges SDDP of the TAX - VAT Merging workshop for TQ.]]

The workshop was mainly facilitated by [[Marios Michaelides]] and [[Yiannis Laouris]].

In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported their satisfaction that they had the opportunity to exchange ideas via the structured dialogue process which empowered the participants to identify and understand the dangers of Internet use. <br>