5,695
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|report_title=[[Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation]] | |report_title=[[Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation]] | ||
|project=[[R&I PEERS]] | |project=[[R&I PEERS]] | ||
|Triggering_Question= | |Triggering_Question=What existing practices can be identified to facilitate the development and implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in academia and research organisations? | ||
|location=Rome | |location=Rome | ||
|dates=7th November 2018 | |dates=7th November 2018 | ||
|LeadFacilitator=[[Andreas P. Andreou]] | |LeadFacilitator=[[Andreas P. Andreou]] | ||
|AsFacilitator= | |AsFacilitator=[[Nagore Ibarra Gonzalez]] | ||
|author= | |author=[[Andreas P. Andreou]] [[Jordan Kent]] | ||
|editor= | |editor= [[Yiannis Laouris ]] | ||
|total_duration=9 | |total_duration=9 hrs | ||
|stats=Participants=15 <br> Number of ideas=29 <br>Number of Clusters=4 <br> Ideas received Votes=22 <br> Ideas on MAP R=15 | |stats=Participants=15 <br> Number of ideas=29 <br>Number of Clusters=4 <br> Ideas received Votes=22 <br> Ideas on MAP R=15 <br> Spreadthink ST=70.8% | ||
|isbn=ISBN | |isbn=ISBN | ||
|link= | |link=[[Media:R&I_PEERS_SDD_Rome.pdf|Download Report]]<br> | ||
[[Media:R-I PEERS Deliverable SUBMITTED 6.6.pdf|Formal Report Rome & Ljubljana]] | |||
}} | }} | ||
==Executive Summary== | |||
The Mutual Learning workshop “Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation” was organised by [[Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche|CNR]], [[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute|CNTI]] and [[Asociacion - Centro de Investigacion Cooperativa en Nanociencias - CIC NANOGUNE (CIC nanoGUNE)|CIC nanoGUNE]] in the context of the project [[R&I PEERS]] funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, on November 7th in Rome, Italy. | |||
The workshop, which was realised using the participatory methodology of the [[Structured Democratic Dialogue]] (SDD), supported by [[Concertina]], brought together fifteen (15) experts from the gender equality field representing universities, governmental and scientific bodies as well as enterprises to discuss the existing practices across Gender Equality Plans (GEPs). | |||
<br> | |||
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) of the workshop was: </u><br> | |||
'''"What existing practices can be identified to facilitate the development and implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in academia and research organisations?"''' | |||
In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 29 ideas, which were categorized in 4 clusters. Following the voting process, 22 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | |||
<br> | |||
[[File:Rome_SDD-Map_Practices.jpg |thumb|center|upright=4.0|400px|alt=MAP for MARINA Brussels MML.|Influence tree from the ideas generated at Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation Workshop]] | |||
<br> | |||
According to the participants of this workshop, the practices that appear to be the most influential were: <br> | |||
* Practice #6: (2 votes) Monitoring gender & diversity state-of-art, gathering gender disaggregated quantitative & qualitative data <br> | |||
* Practice #7: (6 votes) Collection of gender equality data from existing admin database <br> | |||
* Practice #16: (3 votes) Presence of females in the board to select new researchers <br> | |||
* Practice #26: (3 votes) Try to attract more males in Gender Equality Committees <br> | |||
* Practice #27: (4 votes) Introduce some basic gender curricula in STEM | |||
The workshop was facilitated by [[Andreas P. Andreou]]. | |||
==External Links== | |||
[http://ripeers.eu/ R&I PEERS] |