Rotary-Carter-Cyprus 2024-25 Peacebuilding Initiative: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
More actions
mNo edit summary |
Matias.dure (talk | contribs) |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Project | {{Project | ||
|acronym= | |acronym= Rotary-Carter-Cyprus 2024-25 Peacebuilding Initiative | ||
|logo= | |logo=Fwc_Logo_Transparent_HR.png | ||
|project_title=02 Cyprus-Rotary-Carter-2024-25 Peacebuilding initiative | |project_title=[[02 Cyprus-Rotary-Carter-2024-25 Peacebuilding initiative]] | ||
|contract_number= | |contract_number= | ||
|funding_period=1/7/ | |funding_period=1/7/2024 - 31/12/2024 | ||
|coordinator=[[Yiannis Laouris]]<br>[[Meltem Onurkan Samani]] | |coordinator=[[Yiannis Laouris]]<br>[[Meltem Onurkan Samani]] | ||
|funding_agency=[[Rotary International]] | |funding_agency=[[Rotary International]]<br>[[Jubitz Family Foundation]] | ||
|total_cost=€100,000.00 | |total_cost=€100,000.00 | ||
|partners=[[Future Worlds Center]]<br>[[Cyprus Peace and Dialogue Center]] | |partners=[[Future Worlds Center]]<br>[[Cyprus Peace and Dialogue Center]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The ''' | The '''Cyprus-Rotary-Carter-2024-25 Peacebuilding initiative''', was a project funded by [[Rotary International]] and a generous donation from the [[Jubitz Family Foundation]], and implemented by [[Future Worlds Center]] and the [[Cyprus Peace and Dialogue Center]] (CPDC). It aspired to empower Greek and Turkish-speaking Cypriot Rotarians to deepen and expand their joint peace-building engagement and strengthen and raise the profile of Rotarians at large. | ||
A team from Cyprus, led by Senior Rotarians and Profs. [[Harry Anastasiou]] and [[Birol Yesilada]] from [[Portland State University]], in collaboration with Drs. [[Yiannis Laouris]] from [[Future Worlds Center]] and [[Meltem Onurkan Samani]] from the [[Cyprus Peace and Dialogue Center]], implemented the first pilot program. | A team from Cyprus, led by Senior Rotarians and Profs. [[Harry Anastasiou]] and [[Birol Yesilada]] from [[Portland State University - Conflict Resolution Graduate Program|Portland State University]], in collaboration with Drs. [[Yiannis Laouris]] from [[Future Worlds Center]] and [[Meltem Onurkan Samani]] from the [[Cyprus Peace and Dialogue Center]], implemented the first pilot program. | ||
The Cyprus initiative stood at a pivotal moment, aligning perfectly with the UN Secretary-General's recent efforts to reignite high-level negotiations after a seven-year hiatus. This initiative also coincided with the warming relations between Turkey and Greece and the European Union's heightened interest in fostering a durable resolution, as well as with many geopolitical developments in the region including the change of government in the US. | The Cyprus initiative stood at a pivotal moment, aligning perfectly with the UN Secretary-General's recent efforts to reignite high-level negotiations after a seven-year hiatus. This initiative also coincided with the warming relations between Turkey and Greece and the European Union's heightened interest in fostering a durable resolution, as well as with many geopolitical developments in the region including the change of government in the US. | ||
The project began with interviews designed to select, but also to prepare the participants (15 Sep - 20 Oct, 2024). A group of fourteen Rotarians (7 Greek- and 7 Turkish speaking Cypriots) was enhanced with six additional experts, well-known academics and peace activists, and two high-profile social media personalities. The TC past negotiator was invited to join all activities, while the GC negotiator joined selected activities. | The project began with interviews designed to select, but also to prepare the participants (15 Sep - 20 Oct, 2024). A group of fourteen Rotarians (7 Greek- and 7 Turkish speaking Cypriots) was enhanced with six additional experts, well-known academics and peace activists, and two high-profile social media personalities<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidias_Panayiotou Fidias_Panayiotou</ref>, <ref>https://www.youtube.com/@urbancypriot Ibrahim @urban_cypriot Beycanli</ref> . The TC past negotiator Özdil Nami<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Özdil_Nami Özdil Nami </ref> was invited to join all activities, while the GC negotiator Andreas Mavroyiannis <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_Mavroyiannis Andreas Mavroyiannis</ref> joined selected activities. | ||
Between 23 Oct - 6 Nov, 2024, the 22 participants engaged in 4 virtual sessions to examine the current state of affairs and apply the Structured Democratic Dialogue (SDD) methodology to identify root obstacles that prevent progress towards agreeing on a final settlement and contribute towards maintaining the status quo. The development of shared understanding of the problématique would serve as the basis for preparing the selected participants for the Main Event: A dynamic five-day facilitated structured workshop that took place at the [[Point of View]] facility of the [[Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter School for Peace and Conflict Resolution]] (part of [[George Mason University]]) in Washington DC. | |||
The participants of the SDD at the [[Point of View]] were the same fourteen senior Cypriot Rotarians and eight experts (academics, activists, past negotiators, social media). The aim was to generate actionable ideas, innovative projects, strategic frameworks, and policy recommendations that local and regional Rotarians, in collaboration with other local actors, could take to revitalize and elevate peace-building efforts. All discussions were contextualized within global developments, highlighting the pivotal role Cyprus can play in promoting sustainable and peaceful global change. | |||
The participants of the SDD at the [[Point of View]]were fourteen senior Cypriot Rotarians and eight experts (academics, activists, past negotiators, social media). The aim was to generate actionable ideas, innovative projects, strategic frameworks, and policy recommendations that local and regional Rotarians, in collaboration with other local actors, | |||
| Line 33: | Line 32: | ||
# Empower Greek and Turkish-speaking Cypriot Rotarians to deepen and expand their joint peacebuilding initiatives across the ethnic divide by implementing more impactful and upgraded actionable projects. | # Empower Greek and Turkish-speaking Cypriot Rotarians to deepen and expand their joint peacebuilding initiatives across the ethnic divide by implementing more impactful and upgraded actionable projects. | ||
# Strengthen and raise the profile of Rotarians (supported by other expert participants) as constructive and creative peacebuilders, making their efforts more visible and influential. | # Strengthen and raise the profile of Rotarians (supported by other expert participants) as constructive and creative peacebuilders, making their efforts more visible and influential. | ||
# Enable Cypriot Rotarians to share their experiences, learning, and | # Enable Cypriot Rotarians to share their experiences, learning, and proposed activities with other Cypriot and regional Rotarians and civil society organizations, encouraging and inviting them to take action. | ||
# Render the visibility of the extended team | # Render the visibility of the extended team globally, leveraging the engagement of high profile personalities and organizations, to amplify its impact on peacebuilding efforts. | ||
# Compile a White Paper reflecting the outcomes of the Point of View process to be submitted to relevant parties, such as the UN Cyprus envoy team, political parties, business leaders, journalists, academics, educators, and others as deemed appropriate by the participating Rotarians. | # Compile a White Paper reflecting the outcomes of the [[Point of View]] process to be submitted to relevant parties, such as the UN Cyprus envoy team, political parties, business leaders, journalists, academics, educators, and others as deemed appropriate by the participating Rotarians. | ||
# Legitimize initiatives undertaken by peace scholars, activists, and politicians, including those initiated by the project’s participants. | # Legitimize initiatives undertaken by peace scholars, activists, and politicians, including those initiated by the project’s participants. | ||
| Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
=== 1. Onboarding and Induction Period=== | === 1. Onboarding and Induction Period=== | ||
Participants received digital copies of articles and book chapters published by Cypriot and international scholars and peace activists on the Cyprus issue. While they were not required to read and study these works in detail, they were encouraged to review them and appreciate the extensive scholarly investment in the Cyprus problem, reflecting on how this knowledge can be effectively utilized. | Participants received digital copies of articles and book chapters published by Cypriot and international scholars and peace activists on the Cyprus issue. While they were not required to read and study these works in detail, they were encouraged to review them and appreciate the extensive scholarly investment in the Cyprus problem, reflecting on how this knowledge can be effectively utilized. | ||
[[Laouris]] conducted one-on-one Zoom conversations with all participants to build rapport, discuss the project's vision and objectives, and ensure a clear understanding of the various stages and the commitment required. Each participant was required to identify and clarify up to three obstacles they | [[Yiannis Laouris]] conducted one-on-one Zoom conversations with all participants to build rapport, discuss the project's vision and objectives, and ensure a clear understanding of the various stages and the commitment required. Each participant was required to identify and clarify up to three obstacles they perceived as important in the current state of affairs. These conversations also secured participants' consent for the transparent and public use of all data, including utilization of recorded video clips. | ||
=====Specific Objectives of one-to-one conversations===== | =====Specific Objectives of one-to-one conversations===== | ||
# Ensure that all participants | # Ensure that all participants understood the project's vision and objectives. | ||
# Encourage participants to review work done previously. | # Encourage participants to review work done previously. | ||
# Establish a common foundation, encouraging everyone to take a leap of faith and move to the next level. | # Establish a common foundation, encouraging everyone to take a leap of faith and move to the next level. | ||
| Line 54: | Line 53: | ||
** Permission to record all sessions and publish short video clips on social media. | ** Permission to record all sessions and publish short video clips on social media. | ||
** Commitment to propose and engage in project activities following the Main Event. | ** Commitment to propose and engage in project activities following the Main Event. | ||
** Ensure that each participant | ** Ensure that each participant identified and submitted up to three obstacles they perceived as significant in the current state of affairs. | ||
===2. Virtual Dialogue - Identify Root Obstacles=== | ===2. Virtual Dialogue - Identify Root Obstacles=== | ||
The obstacles submitted by each participant during the induction session served as input for a virtual Structured Democratic Dialogue (vSDD). | The obstacles submitted by each participant during the induction session served as input for a virtual Structured Democratic Dialogue (vSDD). The dialogue is documented here: | ||
* [[Cypriot Rotarians identify Challenges that Hinder Peace Settlement, Sep-Oct, 2024]] | * [[Cypriot Rotarians identify Challenges that Hinder Peace Settlement, Sep-Oct, 2024]] | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
* Participants engage in individual work, such as selecting and sharing their preferences, asynchronously between sessions. | * Participants engage in individual work, such as selecting and sharing their preferences, asynchronously between sessions. | ||
The goal was to develop a shared understanding of the | The goal was to develop a shared understanding of the Problématique before participants travelled to Washington, DC, for the Main Event. Establishing a common language and a shared understanding of how the various obstacles are interconnected enabled participants to propose more targeted and effective actions and interventions through their projects. | ||
To avoid duplication and ensure that the obstacles discussed were current and extended beyond previously identified issues, participants were encouraged to review selected materials from the digital copies shared during the induction session. Specifically, the Influence Trees of obstacles identified in the 1990s and those following the negative outcome of the Annan Plan Referendum were shared, presented, and discussed before the first vSDD session. | To avoid duplication and ensure that the obstacles discussed were current and extended beyond previously identified issues, participants were encouraged to review selected materials from the digital copies shared during the induction session. Specifically, the Influence Trees of obstacles identified in the 1990s and those following the negative outcome of the Annan Plan Referendum were shared, presented, and discussed before the first vSDD session. | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
* Mon 11 Nov, 20.00-21.30 | * Mon 11 Nov, 20.00-21.30 | ||
The results are documented in: | |||
* [[Cypriot Rotarians identify Challenges that Hinder Peace Settlement, Sep-Oct, 2024]] | |||
===3. Point of View Dialogue - Explore Actions=== | |||
At the [[Point of View]], the participants generated 84 actionable ideas, innovative projects, strategic frameworks, and policy recommendations that local and regional Rotarians, in collaboration with other local actors, can take to revitalize and elevate peacebuilding efforts. | |||
* [[Cypriot Rotarians' Actionable Initiatives to support Peace Settlement, Point of View, Nov 2024]] | |||
===Formation of a Knowledge Management Team=== | ===Formation of a Knowledge Management Team=== | ||
The implementation of SDDs requires the formation of a team called Knowledge Management Team (KMT) composed of representatives of the Sponsor (or owner), Project Managers, Facilitators, and representative and knowledgeable participants. The KMT’s major task is to formulate the Triggering Questions that will drive the SDD process and to ensure that all requirements for planning and implementing a successful SDD are satisfied. | The implementation of SDDs requires the formation of a team called [[Knowledge Management Team]] (KMT) composed of representatives of the Sponsor (or owner), Project Managers, Facilitators, and representative and knowledgeable participants. The KMT’s major task is to formulate the Triggering Questions that will drive the SDD process and to ensure that all requirements for planning and implementing a successful SDD are satisfied. | ||
====Key requirements for Planning and Implementing an SDD==== | ====Key requirements for Planning and Implementing an SDD==== | ||
| Line 183: | Line 185: | ||
| style="text-align:left;" | | | style="text-align:left;" | | ||
|} | |} | ||
LD: Lead Project Management<br> | |||
R: Rotarian<br> | |||
PC: Local Project Coordinator | |||
F/P: Facilitator/Practitioner<br> | |||
CS: Civil Society Expert<br> | |||
A: Academic<br> | |||
P: Participant<br> | |||
==Citations== | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||