Procedure: Preparing a grant application: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
More actions
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
In some calls, up to 20% of the score might come from the innovative character of the application. | In some calls, up to 20% of the score might come from the innovative character of the application. | ||
==Person in charge of preparing the theoretical background and justification== | |||
==Person in charge of preparing the technical/development/activities WPs== | ==Person in charge of preparing the technical/development/activities WPs== | ||
| Line 46: | Line 50: | ||
In most calls, the budget might have no or low score. But if wrong the application might be considered ineligible. One might get a grant with a bad budget and the organization will incur financial losses or extreme difficulties in materializing the activities. Even worse, the project might have to be modified in ways that can contradict the contract and lead to project delays and or needs for amendments. | In most calls, the budget might have no or low score. But if wrong the application might be considered ineligible. One might get a grant with a bad budget and the organization will incur financial losses or extreme difficulties in materializing the activities. Even worse, the project might have to be modified in ways that can contradict the contract and lead to project delays and or needs for amendments. | ||
In order to avoid any potential problems, the person in charge of the application process should involve the Financial Officer in the process of budgeting who can provide advise, check the budget and complete the expenditure explanation part of the application. Please note that '''no budget can be submitted without the prior approval of the Financial Officer'''. | |||
==Person in charge of the management WP== | ==Person in charge of the management WP== | ||
| Line 61: | Line 67: | ||
==Person in charge of valorization and exploitation WPs== | ==Person in charge of valorization and exploitation WPs== | ||
A good application has an excellent valorization and exploitation plan. These processes are to a great extent standardized. On the average about 10-15% of the score goes here. There is no excuse to loose even one point. | A good application has an excellent valorization and exploitation plan. These processes are to a great extent standardized. On the average about 10-15% of the score goes here. There is no excuse to loose even one point. | ||
==Person in charge of reviewing the application== | ==Person in charge of reviewing the application== | ||