Planetary Dialogue SDDP on Obama's Vision: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
|editor= [[Yiannis Laouris]]
|editor= [[Yiannis Laouris]]
|total_duration=3 weeks
|total_duration=3 weeks
|stats=Participants=17 <br> Number of ideas=59  <br>Number of Clusters=13 <br> Ideas received Votes=41  <br> Ideas on MAP R=13  <br>Spreathink  ST=66,6%  <br>Situational Complexity  SCI=  
|stats=Participants=15 <br> Number of ideas=59  <br>Number of Clusters=13 <br> Ideas received Votes=41  <br> Ideas on MAP R=13 in v1; 16 in v2. <br>Spreathink  ST=66,6%  <br>Situational Complexity  SCI=  
|dates=15 November, 13 December 2008
|dates=15 November, 13 December 2008
|link=[[Media:Planetary_SUMMARYREPORTCOLABIJUNE2007.pdf|Download Report]]<br>[[Media:Ozbekhan_PhilanthropolisApril23.pdf|Download Pre-Report]]
|link=[[Media: WelcometotheObamaVisionWebinar.pdf|Download Welcoming 1]]<br>[[Media: WelcometotheObamaVisionWebinar.pdf|Download Welcoming 2]]<br>[[Media: Obama_ANTICIPATING THE CHALLENGES TO THE VISION OF A BOTTOM-UP DEMOCRACY.pdf|Download Report]]
}}
}}


Line 18: Line 18:
==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==


An international panel of 20 experts/stakeholders in e-democracy and structured dialogue were engaged for three weeks in an asynchronous and synchronous virtual interaction employing the technology of the Webscope wiki. The panel was invited to use the Structured Dialogic Design process (SDDP).  
An international panel of 15 experts/stakeholders in e-democracy and structured dialogue were engaged for three weeks in an asynchronous and synchronous virtual interaction employing the technology of the Webscope wiki. The panel was invited to use the Structured Dialogic Design Process (SDDP).  


This [[2008 Historic Virtual SDDP]] was probably the first conducted with all participants located in different continents.
This [[2008 Historic Virtual SDDP]] was probably the first conducted with all participants located on different continents.


==Triggering Question==
'''"In the context of Obama's vision for engaging stakeholders from all walks of life in a bottom-up democracy employing Internet technology, what factors do we anticipate, on the basis of our experiences with SDDP, will emerge as inhibitors to the actualization of his vision?"'''


<br>
In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 59 ideas, which were categorized in 13 clusters. Following the voting process, 41 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) of the workshop was: </u><br>
 
==Clusters==
# Technological Knowhow
# Equity & Acceess
# Facilitation
# Acknowledgement & Commitment
# Engagement Limitations
# Implementability
# Addressing variety
# Purposefulness
# Confidentiality
# Methodology
# Paradigm Shift
# Trust
# Domination


'''What are descriptors/requirements of the ideal image of the Agora of Philanthropolis'''


In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 59 ideas, which were categorized in 13 clusters. Following the voting process, 41 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>


==Influence Map version 1==
<br>
<br>
[[File:PlanetaryDialogue_SDDP_MAP_2007.png|thumb|center|upright=4.0|alt=MAP for Obama Vision.|Influence tree from the ideas generated at Obama Vision SDDP  workshop for TQ.]]
[[File:Obamavision sddp map.png|thumb|center|upright=4.0|alt=MAP for Obama Vision v.1.|Influence tree from the ideas generated at Obama Vision SDDP  workshop for TQ.]]
<br>
<br>


<br>
==Influence Map version 2==
[[File:Finders_PlanetaryDialogue_2006_ListofFactors.pdf|thumb|center|upright=4.0|alt=MAP for Obama Vision.|"What factors will help significantly in rescuing the enlightent from its failings?"
[[File:Obama_MAP_v2_.png|800px|center|upright=4.0|alt=MAP for Obama Vision v.2.|Influence tree from the ideas generated at Obama Vision SDDP  workshop for TQ.]]
<br>
 
 
 
 


According to the participants of this workshop, the ideas that appear to be the most influential were: <br>
According to the participants of this workshop, the ideas that appear to be the most influential were: <br>
 
* INHIBITOR #2: RISK OF EXCLUDING DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE <br>
* INHIBITOR #8: TECHNICAL TECHNOLOGICAL EXCLUSION <br>
* INHIBITOR #14: INSUFFICIENT ATTENTION GIVEN TO FACILITATOR CAPACITATION <br>
* INHIBITOR #18: SCALABILITY OF DISCUSSION TECHNOLOGY <br>
* INHIBITOR #23: SOCIAL CONTRACT OVERLOAD <br>




Line 46: Line 68:




In sum, the dialogue made it possible for the participants to imagine and describe a collective understanding of the complex situation (Problematique) facing the Obama administration in their vision of realizing bottom-up democracy in the USA, and maybe other parts of the planet.<br>
In sum, the dialogue made it possible for the participants to imagine and describe a collective understanding of the complex situation (Problematique) facing the Obama administration in their vision of realizing bottom-up democracy in the USA, and maybe other parts of the planet.<br>


==Facilitators==
==Facilitators==
Line 88: Line 110:
! scope="col" style="background:#efefef;" align="left"| Name
! scope="col" style="background:#efefef;" align="left"| Name
|-
|-
|Craig Lindell
|[[Craig Lindell]]
|-
|-
|Heiner Benbking
|[[Heiner Benking]]
|-
|-
|Jon Li Davis  
|Jon Li Davis  
|-
|-
|Ken Bausch
|[[Ken Bausch]]
|-
|-
|Larry Fergeson
|[[Larry Fergeson]]
|-
|-
|Kevin Dye
|[[Kevin Dye]]
|-
|-
|La Donna Harris
|[[La Donna Harris]]
|-
|-
|Mancerac
|Mancerac
|-
|-
|Norma Romm
|[[Norma Romm]]
|-
|-
|Paul Hays
|[[Paul Hays]]
|-
|-
|Peter Jones
|[[Peter Jones]]
|-
|-
|Roy Smith
|[[Roy Smith]]
|-
|-
|Tom Flanagan
|[[Tom Flanagan]]
|-
|-
|Janet McIntyre
|[[Janet McIntyre]]
|-
|-
|Reynaldo Trevino
|[[Reynaldo Treviño-Cisneros]]
|}
|}


Latest revision as of 23:19, 12 September 2022

SDDP ObamaVision
SDDP ObamaVision
Report Title SDDP ObamaVision
Triggering Question "In the context of Obama's vision for engaging stakeholders from all walks of life in a bottom-up democracy employing Internet technology, what factors do we anticipate, on the basis of our experiences with SDDP, will emerge as inhibitors to the actualization of his vision?"
Dates 15 November, 13 December 2008
Author(s) Aleco Christakis
Gayle Underwood
Editor(s) Yiannis Laouris
Total Duration 3 weeks
Statistics Participants=15
Number of ideas=59
Number of Clusters=13
Ideas received Votes=41
Ideas on MAP R=13 in v1; 16 in v2.
Spreathink ST=66,6%
Situational Complexity SCI=
Download Download Welcoming 1
Download Welcoming 2
Download Report




Executive Summary

An international panel of 15 experts/stakeholders in e-democracy and structured dialogue were engaged for three weeks in an asynchronous and synchronous virtual interaction employing the technology of the Webscope wiki. The panel was invited to use the Structured Dialogic Design Process (SDDP).

This 2008 Historic Virtual SDDP was probably the first conducted with all participants located on different continents.

Triggering Question

"In the context of Obama's vision for engaging stakeholders from all walks of life in a bottom-up democracy employing Internet technology, what factors do we anticipate, on the basis of our experiences with SDDP, will emerge as inhibitors to the actualization of his vision?"

In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 59 ideas, which were categorized in 13 clusters. Following the voting process, 41 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.

Clusters

  1. Technological Knowhow
  2. Equity & Acceess
  3. Facilitation
  4. Acknowledgement & Commitment
  5. Engagement Limitations
  6. Implementability
  7. Addressing variety
  8. Purposefulness
  9. Confidentiality
  10. Methodology
  11. Paradigm Shift
  12. Trust
  13. Domination


Influence Map version 1


MAP for Obama Vision v.1.
Influence tree from the ideas generated at Obama Vision SDDP workshop for TQ.


Influence Map version 2

MAP for Obama Vision v.2.



According to the participants of this workshop, the ideas that appear to be the most influential were:

  • INHIBITOR #2: RISK OF EXCLUDING DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE
  • INHIBITOR #8: TECHNICAL TECHNOLOGICAL EXCLUSION
  • INHIBITOR #14: INSUFFICIENT ATTENTION GIVEN TO FACILITATOR CAPACITATION
  • INHIBITOR #18: SCALABILITY OF DISCUSSION TECHNOLOGY
  • INHIBITOR #23: SOCIAL CONTRACT OVERLOAD


The co-laboratory was facilitated by a team led by Aleco Christakis. While Aleco was based in Crete, his Co-Facilitators, and Assistant Facilitators were based in the USA and in Cyprus.


In sum, the dialogue made it possible for the participants to imagine and describe a collective understanding of the complex situation (Problematique) facing the Obama administration in their vision of realizing bottom-up democracy in the USA, and maybe other parts of the planet.

Facilitators

Name City
Aleco Christakis Archanes, Crete
Gayle Underwood Allegan, Michigan, USA
Yiannis Laouris Nicosia, Cyprus
Elia Petridou Nicosia, Cyprus
Maria Georgiou Nicosia, Cyprus













Participants

Name
Craig Lindell
Heiner Benking
Jon Li Davis
Ken Bausch
Larry Fergeson
Kevin Dye
La Donna Harris
Mancerac
Norma Romm
Paul Hays
Peter Jones
Roy Smith
Tom Flanagan
Janet McIntyre
Reynaldo Treviño-Cisneros


External Links

http://obamavision.wikispaces.com/


Planetary_SUMMARYREPORTCOLABIJUNE2007.pdf Ozbekhan_PhilanthropolisApril23.pdf

Retrieved from "https://futureworlds.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Planetary_Dialogue_SDDP_on_Obama%27s_Vision&oldid=26332"