Science of teleology: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
More actions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Teleology would say that a person has eyes because he has the need of eyesight, (form follows function), while naturalism would argue that a person has sight simply because he has eyes, or that function follows form (eyesight follows from having eyes). | Teleology would say that a person has eyes because he has the need of eyesight, (form follows function), while naturalism would argue that a person has sight simply because he has eyes, or that function follows form (eyesight follows from having eyes). | ||
In European philosophy, teleology may be identified with | In European philosophy, teleology may be identified with Aristotelian tradition. Most theology presupposes a teleology: "intelligent design" is a teleological argument for the existence of God. Aristotle's analysis speaks of a material cause, efficient cause, and formal cause, but all these serve a final cause. | ||
There are two types of final cause: | There are two types of final cause: | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:G-Concepts]] | ||