SDDP CARDIAC I: Technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
'''What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?''' | '''What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?''' | ||
In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, | In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* Mechanism #1, Big delay in decision making from the governmental side | * Mechanism #1, Big delay in decision making from the governmental side | ||
The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> <br> | |||
The workshop was facilitated by [[Elena Aristodemou]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]), [[Aleco Christakis]] and [[Georgina Siitta Achilleos]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]). The workshop was attended by 21 Cypriots participants. | The workshop was facilitated by [[Elena Aristodemou]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]), [[Aleco Christakis]] and [[Georgina Siitta Achilleos]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]). The workshop was attended by 21 Cypriots participants. | ||
