SDDP Economic Integration - Vision, July 2007 (1st co-laboratory): Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
   |acronym=SDDP Economic Integration Co-Laboratories                   
   |acronym=SDDP Economic Integration Co-Laboratories                   
   |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg   
   |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg   
   |report_title=Report of SDDP Co-Laboratories
   |report_title=Report of SDDP Co-Laboratories - Economic Integration
   |LeadFacilitator= [[Aleco Christakis]], Derya Beyatli, [[Kevin Dye]], [[Andros Karayiannis]], [[Tatjana Taraszow]],and [[Ilke Dagli]].
   |LeadFacilitator= [[Aleco Christakis]], Derya Beyatli, [[Kevin Dye]], [[Andros Karayiannis]], [[Tatjana Taraszow]],and [[Ilke Dagli]].
   |AsFacilitator=  
   |AsFacilitator=  
Line 47: Line 47:
'''<u>Interpretation of the Results </u>'''
'''<u>Interpretation of the Results </u>'''
   
   
As shown in Table 2 ‘Economic Integration – Desired Situation – Voting Results’, 29 descriptors received one or more votes. If the same five descriptors had received all votes, then there would be a 100% agreement among the members of the stakeholder representatives group in terms of relative importance of the proposed descriptors of the desired situation of economic integration and free movement of goods and services within Cyprus and the EU. Because 29 descriptors received at least one vote, there exists a perceptible disagreement. The degree of disagreement in terms of preference voting, i.e. in terms of relative importance of the proposed descriptors, is an indicator of the complexity of the situation, which leads to a need to engage a stakeholder group in a structured dialogue about economic integration in Cyprus.
At the end of the voting, it was shown that 29 descriptors received one or more votes. If the same five descriptors had received all votes, then there would be a 100% agreement among the members of the stakeholder representatives group in terms of relative importance of the proposed descriptors of the desired situation of economic integration and free movement of goods and services within Cyprus and the EU. Because 29 descriptors received at least one vote, there exists a perceptible disagreement. The degree of disagreement in terms of preference voting, i.e. in terms of relative importance of the proposed descriptors, is an indicator of the complexity of the situation, which leads to a need to engage a stakeholder group in a structured dialogue about economic integration in Cyprus.


On the other hand, level of agreement on the above factors (factor 4, 27 and 25) is undeniable, when considering that 41.2% of the participants (7/17) in the first session had voted for factor 4, whereas, 35.3 % and 29.4% had voted for factors 27 and 25 respectively. This level of agreement is in fact a starting point for a common vision to be built upon.
On the other hand, level of agreement on the above factors (factor 4, 27 and 25) is undeniable, when considering that 41.2% of the participants (7/17) in the first session had voted for factor 4, whereas, 35.3 % and 29.4% had voted for factors 27 and 25 respectively. This level of agreement is in fact a starting point for a common vision to be built upon.




Line 70: Line 68:
== Organizers and partners==
== Organizers and partners==


 
The Facilitation Team of these economic integration workshops consisted of:[[Aleco Christakis]], Derya Beyatli, [[Kevin Dye]], [[Andros Karayiannis]], [[Tatjana Taraszow]],and [[Ilke Dagli]]




==External Links==
==External Links==
[[Category:SDDP Reports]]
[[Category:SDDP Reports]]