Procedure: Preparing a grant application: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
In some calls, up to 20% of the score might come from the innovative character of the application. | In some calls, up to 20% of the score might come from the innovative character of the application. | ||
==Person in charge of preparing the theoretical background and justification== | |||
==Person in charge of preparing the technical/development/activities WPs== | ==Person in charge of preparing the technical/development/activities WPs== | ||
| Line 61: | Line 65: | ||
==Person in charge of valorization and exploitation WPs== | ==Person in charge of valorization and exploitation WPs== | ||
A good application has an excellent valorization and exploitation plan. These processes are to a great extent standardized. On the average about 10-15% of the score goes here. There is no excuse to loose even one point. | A good application has an excellent valorization and exploitation plan. These processes are to a great extent standardized. On the average about 10-15% of the score goes here. There is no excuse to loose even one point. | ||
==Person in charge of reviewing the application== | ==Person in charge of reviewing the application== | ||
