AER-V SDDP of the International Facilitators Training School 2022: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:




<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br>
==[[Triggering Question]]==
'''What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?'''
'''What would you consider as useful characteristics of a validation system for the EU projects' managers?'''


In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
In response to the TQ, the 24 participants came up with 46 ideas, which were categorized into 13 clusters.  


<br>
<br>
Line 40: Line 40:
* 26: (4 Votes) Validation through transparent procedures  
* 26: (4 Votes) Validation through transparent procedures  


 
Following the voting process, 25 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>


<br>
<br>
Line 52: Line 52:




The structuring process was continued in a smaller group, at the on-line, follow-up co-laboratory workshop that took place the 8th of July 2022. The analysis of influence was made adding also the ideas that received 3 and 2 votes. As the effect, the factors on the map were structured on 7 levels:  
The structuring process was continued in a smaller group at the online, follow-up co-laboratory workshop that took place on the 8th of July 2022. The analysis of influence was made, also adding the ideas that received 3 and 2 votes. As an effect, the factors on the map were structured on 7 levels:  


Level 1 = [16, 6, 17, 1, 23]<br>
Level 1 = [16, 6, 17, 1, 23]<br>
Line 69: Line 69:




According to this map the most influential idea that according to the collective wisdom of the participants needs to be addressed with priority is:  
According to this map, the most influential idea that, according to the collective wisdom of the participants, needs to be addressed with priority is:  


Idea 24: The dimension of mission and purpose is crucial
'''Idea 24: The dimension of mission and purpose is crucial'''
Clarification: The wanted validation system is not for project management in general, but more specific for project management in a civil society (3rd sector), where the value-driven approach is essential both for the NGOs and their volunteers contrary to the project management in the market area (2nd sector) where the economic rationality of profit is essential;  and the public area (1st sector), where the bureaucratic rationality is essential. Even though many of the needed technical skills may be the same in the three sectors, the leadership competences in the third sector may need a more clear focus on the purpose and meaning of the activities, and the strategic competences may be aware of the importance of the content-related mission and purpose as the main driver to engage and motivate the volunteers who are active not as employees but as active citizens.
Clarification: The wanted validation system is not for project management in general, but more specific for project management in a civil society (3rd sector), where the value-driven approach is essential both for the NGOs and their volunteers contrary to the project management in the market area (2nd sector) where the economic rationality of profit is essential;  and the public area (1st sector), where the bureaucratic rationality is essential. Even though many of the needed technical skills may be the same in the three sectors, the leadership competences in the third sector may need a more clear focus on the purpose and meaning of the activities, and the strategic competences may be aware of the importance of the content-related mission and purpose as the main driver to engage and motivate the volunteers who are active not as employees but as active citizens.


The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> <br>
The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and, in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices had been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> <br>




Retrieved from "https://futureworlds.eu/wiki/AER-V_SDDP_of_the_International_Facilitators_Training_School_2022"