SDDP Peace Education Initiative 2017- Challenges: Difference between revisions
Jordankent (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jordankent (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
In response to the TQ, the 11 participants came up with 36 characteristics, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 24 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | In response to the TQ, the 11 participants came up with 36 characteristics, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 24 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:Peaceeducationchallengeclusters.jpg|thumb|center|700px|upright=4.0|alt=MAP for MeDevNet Athens .|Influence tree from the Characteristics SDDP of the MeDevNet Athens laboratory TQ.]] | |||
<br> | |||
According to the participants of this workshop, appear to be the most influential were: <br> | According to the participants of this workshop, appear to be the most influential were: <br> |
Revision as of 00:19, 24 April 2018
|
Executive Summary
The Triggering Question (TQ) was
What are needed reforms designed and integrated into the existing educational systems so as to render education in the respective communities catalytic and supportive of mutual understanding, cooperation and peaceful coexistence among the people of Cyprus?
In response to the TQ, the 11 participants came up with 36 characteristics, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 24 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.
According to the participants of this workshop, appear to be the most influential were:
- Challenge 36: Political instability regarding reconciliation
- Challenge 05: The involvement of motherlands
- Challenge 32: The impact of religion
- Challenge 34: Denial to interact with the other
The workshop was facilitated by Yiannis Laouris, Harry Anastasiou, Katerina Fotiou and Ngam Leslie Timngum. The workshop was attended by 11 participants.
In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.
Sponsor and partners
The workshop was funded under the X.
Gallery
Participants
The participants were:
# | Name and Surname | Age | Gender | Occupation |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ulus Irkad | 50+ | Male | Primary teacher (Phd student on Peace Education) |
2 | Sophia Arnaouti | 31-40 | Female | Global Education Officer |
3 | Okan Bullici | 18-30 | Male | Psychologist |
4 | Evie Grouta | 18-30 | Female | Freelance Educator |
5 | Yeliz Osman | 18-30 | Female | PhD candidate |
6 | Hazal Ozaktan | 18-30 | Female | Freelancer |
7 | Maria Loizou- Theodosiou | 50+ | Female | Teacher |
8 | Zehra Azizbeyli | 31-40 | Female | Lecturer |
9 | Katerina Antoniou | 18-30 | Female | Lecturer |
10 | Nasia Hadjigeorgiou | 18-30 | Female | University Lecturer (School of Law) |
11 | Pantelis Makris | 50+ | Male | Special Education Consultant |