Laws of Dialogic Design Science: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with " # '''Variety''' The Law of Requisite Variety demands that an appreciation of the diversity of perspectives and stakeholders is essential in managing complex situations...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The application of [[[Dialogic Design Science]]] requires Facilitators implementing a [[Structured Democratic Dialogue Process]] to strictly comply with 7 Laws.
 
 


# '''Variety''' The [[Law of Requisite Variety]] demands that an appreciation of the diversity of perspectives and stakeholders is essential in managing complex situations. The Law of Requisite Variety is attributed to [[William Ross Ashby]].
# '''Variety''' The [[Law of Requisite Variety]] demands that an appreciation of the diversity of perspectives and stakeholders is essential in managing complex situations. The Law of Requisite Variety is attributed to [[William Ross Ashby]].
Line 7: Line 5:
# '''Saliency'''. The Law of [[Requisite Saliency]] states that the relative saliency of observations can only be understood through comparisons within an organized set of observations. The Law of Requisite Saliency is attributed to [[Kenneth Boulding]].
# '''Saliency'''. The Law of [[Requisite Saliency]] states that the relative saliency of observations can only be understood through comparisons within an organized set of observations. The Law of Requisite Saliency is attributed to [[Kenneth Boulding]].
# '''Meaning'''. The [[Law of Requisite Meaning]] states that meaning and wisdom are produced in a dialogue only when observers search for relationships of similarity, priority, influence, etc, within a set of observations. The Law of Requisite Meaning is attributed to [[Charles Sanders Peirce]].
# '''Meaning'''. The [[Law of Requisite Meaning]] states that meaning and wisdom are produced in a dialogue only when observers search for relationships of similarity, priority, influence, etc, within a set of observations. The Law of Requisite Meaning is attributed to [[Charles Sanders Peirce]].
5. '''Autonomy and Authenticity'''. The [[Law of Requisite Autonomy and Authenticity]] in distinction-making demands that during the dialogue it is necessary to protect the autonomy and authenticity of each observer in drawing distinctions. The Law of Requisite Autonomy and Authenticity is attributed to [[Ioanna Tsivacou]].
# '''Autonomy and Authenticity'''. The [[Law of Requisite Autonomy and Authenticity]] in distinction-making demands that during the dialogue it is necessary to protect the autonomy and authenticity of each observer in drawing distinctions. The Law of Requisite Autonomy and Authenticity is attributed to [[Ioanna Tsivacou]].
6. '''Evolution of Observations'''. The [[Law of Requisite Evolution of Observations]] states that learning occurs in a dialogue as the observers search for influence relationships among members of a set of observations. The Law of Requisite Evolution of Observations is attributed to [[Kevin Dye]].
# '''Evolution of Observations'''. The [[Law of Requisite Evolution of Observations]] states that learning occurs in a dialogue as the observers search for influence relationships among members of a set of observations. The Law of Requisite Evolution of Observations is attributed to [[Kevin Dye]].
7. '''Action'''. The [[Law Requisite Action]] predicts that any action plan to reform complex social systems designed without the authentic and true engagement of those whose futures will be influenced by the change are bound to fail. The Law of Requisite Action is attributed to [[Yiannis Laouris]].
# '''Action'''. The [[Law Requisite Action]] predicts that any action plan to reform complex social systems designed without the authentic and true engagement of those whose futures will be influenced by the change are bound to fail. The Law of Requisite Action is attributed to [[Yiannis Laouris]].




Retrieved from "https://futureworlds.eu/wiki/Laws_of_Dialogic_Design_Science"