155
edits
SDDP Civil Society Dialogue Obstacles (view source)
Revision as of 07:25, 7 March 2012
, 7 March 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
This paper reports the results of the first of a series of co-laboratories organized by Cypriot peace pioneers 30 months after the negative outcome of the referendum concerning UN General Secretary’s plan for reunification of the island. The purpose of this Co-Laboratory was to support a diverse group of disengaged and disappointed peace pioneers and activists representing Turkish and Greek communities of Cyprus develop a shared understanding of factors contributing to the perceived widening of the gap between the two divided communities in Cyprus. The co-laboratory was organized using the structured dialogic design process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication | This paper reports the results of the first of a series of co-laboratories organized by Cypriot peace pioneers 30 months after the negative outcome of the referendum concerning UN General Secretary’s plan for reunification of the island. The purpose of this Co-Laboratory was to support a diverse group of disengaged and disappointed peace pioneers and activists representing Turkish and Greek communities of Cyprus develop a shared understanding of factors contributing to the perceived widening of the gap between the two divided communities in Cyprus. The co-laboratory was organized using the structured dialogic design process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication | ||
environment. The root causes contributing to the widening of the gap are discussed and are also compared with those identified during a similar co-laboratory employing the Interactive Management methodology 12 years earlier. | environment. The root causes contributing to the widening of the gap are discussed and are also compared with those identified during a similar co-laboratory employing the Interactive Management methodology 12 years earlier. | ||
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br> | <u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
In response to the TQ, the 22 participants came up with 120 obstacles, which were categorized in 20 clusters. Following the voting process, 47 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | In response to the TQ, the 22 participants came up with 120 obstacles, which were categorized in 20 clusters. Following the voting process, 47 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
<br> | |||
[[File:CivilSocietyDialogue_MAP_Obstacles.jpg|thumb|center|upright=3.0|alt=Influence tree from the Obstacles SDDP of the Civil Society Dialogue co-Laboratory.|Influence tree from the Obstacles SDDP of the Civil Society Dialogue co-Laboratory.]] | |||
<br> | |||
According to the participants of this Co-Laboratory, appear to be the most influential were: <br> | According to the participants of this Co-Laboratory, appear to be the most influential were: <br> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 38: | ||
The full paper can be downloaded from [http://socialsystems.wikispaces.com/file/view/Laouris+Cyprus+Referendum.pdf| Open Access].<br> | The full paper can be downloaded from [http://socialsystems.wikispaces.com/file/view/Laouris+Cyprus+Referendum.pdf| Open Access].<br> | ||