578
edits
Jordankent (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jordankent (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|editor= | |editor= | ||
|total_duration=737 person hrs | |total_duration=737 person hrs | ||
|stats=Participants= 17<br> Number of ideas= | |stats=Participants= 17<br> Number of ideas=38 <br>Number of Clusters=7 <br> <br> Ideas on MAP R=20 | ||
|dates= October - November, 2017 | |dates= October - November, 2017 | ||
|link= (insert initiative report link) | |link= (insert initiative report link) | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
'''"What are key shortcomings of our current systems of governance that could be improved through technology?"''' | '''"What are key shortcomings of our current systems of governance that could be improved through technology?"''' | ||
In response to the TQ, the 17 participants came up with | In response to the TQ, the 17 participants came up with 38 challenges, which were categorized in 7 clusters. Following the voting process, 20 challenges were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
According to the participants of this workshop, appear to be the most influential | According to the participants of this workshop, the following challenges appear to be the most influential: <br> | ||
* Challenge | *Challenge 12: Inclusivity <br> | ||
*Challenge 34: Lack of transparency <br> | |||
*Challenge 1: Corruption <br> | |||
*Challenge 7: Lack of use of technology to engage youth <br> | |||
*Challenge 11: Technology in Democracy: A double edged sword? <br> | |||
*Challenge 18 Issues with voting <br> | |||
*Challenge 37: Dysfunctional design of systems with the little scope of e-design <br> | |||
==Gallery== | ==Gallery== | ||
<gallery mode="packed-hover"> | <gallery mode="packed-hover"> | ||
File: | File: | ||
File: | File: | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
edits