Procedure: Preparing a grant application: Difference between revisions

Procedure: Preparing a grant application (view source)

241 bytes added , 30 August 2011

no edit summary

Ninja, Ninla, Bots, Bureaucrats, recentchangescleanup, Administrators

4,971

edits

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 In most calls, the budget might have no or low score. But if wrong the application might be considered ineligible. One might get a grant with a bad budget and the organization will incur financial losses or extreme difficulties in materializing the activities. Even worse, the project might have to be modified in ways that can contradict the contract and lead to project delays and or needs for amendments.
-==Person in charge of the management and evaluation WPs==
+==Person in charge of the management WP==
-A good application has an excellent management system in place. It also has provisions for internal and/or external evaluations. These processes are to a great extent standardized. On the average about 10% of the score goes here. There is no excuse to loose even one point.
+A good application has an excellent management system in place. These processes are to a great extent standardized. On the average about 10% of the score goes here. There is no excuse to loose even one point.
+==Person in charge of the evaluation WP==
+A good application has provisions for internal and/or external evaluations. These processes are to a great extent standardized. On the average about 5% of the score goes here, which might make the difference between funded/not-funded. There is no excuse to loose even one point.
 ==Person in charge of the Work program WPs==