5,712
edits
No edit summary |
(change of template) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SDD_Report | {{SDD_Report | ||
|acronym=SDDP Civil Society Dialogue - Obstacles | |acronym= SDDP Civil Society Dialogue - Obstacles | ||
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | |book_image= SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | ||
|report_title=A Systemic Evaluation of the State of Affairs Following the Negative Outcome of the Referendum in Cyprus Using the Structured Dialogic Design Process | |report_title= A Systemic Evaluation of the State of Affairs Following the Negative Outcome of the Referendum in Cyprus Using the Structured Dialogic Design Process | ||
|Triggering_Question=What factors contribute to the increasing gap between the two communities in Cyprus? | |project= [[Civil Society Dialogue]] | ||
| | |Triggering_Question= What factors contribute to the increasing gap between the two communities in Cyprus? | ||
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Marios Michaelides]] <br>[[Mustafa | |location= | ||
|editor= | |dates=September December 2006 | ||
|total_duration=218 person hrs | |LeadFacilitator= [[Yiannis Laouris]]<br> [[Marios Michaelides]]<br>[[Aleco Christakis]] | ||
|stats=Participants=22 <br>Number of ideas=120 <br>Number of Clusters=20 <br> Ideas received Votes=60 <br> Ideas on MAP R=20 <br>Spreathink ST=50% <br>Situational Complexity SCI=22,9 | |AsFacilitator= [[Ilke Dagli]] | ||
| | |author= [[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Marios Michaelides]] <br>[[Mustafa Damdelen]]<br> [[Romina Laouri]] <br>[[Derya Beyatli]] <br> [[Aleco Christakis]] | ||
|link=[http://socialsystems.wikispaces.com/file/view/Laouris+Cyprus+Referendum.pdf Download Open Access] | |editor= | ||
|total_duration= 218 person hrs | |||
|stats= Participants=22 <br>Number of ideas=120 <br>Number of Clusters=20 <br> Ideas received Votes=60 <br> Ideas on MAP R=20 <br>Spreathink ST=50% <br>Situational Complexity SCI=22,9 | |||
|isbn= | |||
|link= [http://socialsystems.wikispaces.com/file/view/Laouris+Cyprus+Referendum.pdf Download Open Access] | |||
}} | }} | ||
==Executive Summary== | ==Executive Summary== | ||
Line 18: | Line 21: | ||
This paper reports the results of the first of a series of co-laboratories organized by Cypriot peace pioneers 30 months after the negative outcome of the referendum concerning UN General Secretary’s plan for reunification of the island. The purpose of this Co-Laboratory was to support a diverse group of disengaged and disappointed peace pioneers and activists representing Turkish and Greek communities of Cyprus develop a shared understanding of factors contributing to the perceived widening of the gap between the two divided communities in Cyprus. The co-laboratory was organized using the structured dialogic design process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication | This paper reports the results of the first of a series of co-laboratories organized by Cypriot peace pioneers 30 months after the negative outcome of the referendum concerning UN General Secretary’s plan for reunification of the island. The purpose of this Co-Laboratory was to support a diverse group of disengaged and disappointed peace pioneers and activists representing Turkish and Greek communities of Cyprus develop a shared understanding of factors contributing to the perceived widening of the gap between the two divided communities in Cyprus. The co-laboratory was organized using the structured dialogic design process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication | ||
environment. The root causes contributing to the widening of the gap are discussed and are also compared with those identified during a similar co-laboratory employing the Interactive Management methodology 12 years earlier. | environment. The root causes contributing to the widening of the gap are discussed and are also compared with those identified during a similar co-laboratory employing the Interactive Management methodology 12 years earlier. | ||
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br> | <u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br> | ||
Line 23: | Line 27: | ||
In response to the TQ, the 22 participants came up with 120 obstacles, which were categorized in 20 clusters. Following the voting process, 47 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | In response to the TQ, the 22 participants came up with 120 obstacles, which were categorized in 20 clusters. Following the voting process, 47 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
<br> | |||
[[File:CivilSocietyDialogue_MAP_Obstacles.jpg|thumb|center|upright=3.0|alt=Influence tree from the Obstacles SDDP of the Civil Society Dialogue co-Laboratory.|Influence tree from the Obstacles SDDP of the Civil Society Dialogue co-Laboratory.]] | |||
<br> | |||
According to the participants of this Co-Laboratory, appear to be the most influential were: <br> | According to the participants of this Co-Laboratory, appear to be the most influential were: <br> | ||
Line 33: | Line 41: | ||
The full paper can be downloaded from [http://socialsystems.wikispaces.com/file/view/Laouris+Cyprus+Referendum.pdf| Open Access].<br> | The full paper can be downloaded from [http://socialsystems.wikispaces.com/file/view/Laouris+Cyprus+Referendum.pdf| Open Access].<br> | ||
Line 62: | Line 64: | ||
[[Category:SDDP (Society)]] | [[Category:SDDP (Society)]] | ||
[[Category:SDDP (Civil Society Dialogue)]] | [[Category:SDDP (Civil Society Dialogue)]] | ||
[[Category: SDDP Reports]] |