510
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> | {{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> | ||
|acronym= | |acronym=Vision of “what ought to be” <!-- Append to variable acronym the content acronym of the sdd report --> | ||
|book_image= | |book_image= <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the content--> | ||
|report_title= | |report_title=SDDP Act Beyond Borders Vision Building (Larnaka 2010) | ||
|Triggering_Question= | |Triggering_Question=“What are descriptors of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians?” | ||
|project= | |project=[[SDDP]] | ||
|author= | |author= | ||
|editor= | |editor= | ||
|total_duration= | |total_duration=6 days | ||
|stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of ideas= | |stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of ideas=69 <br>Number of Clusters=10 <br> Ideas received Votes=6 | ||
|dates= | |dates=24th - 31th February 2010 | ||
|link= | |link= | ||
}} | |||
==Participants== | ==Participants== | ||
Line 83: | Line 80: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
==Executive Summary== | |||
This report has been developed in the context of the [[CARDIAC]] project (FP7 - Coordinating Action: Grant Agreement 248582). The goal of the project is to create a platform that can bring together the various stakeholders in the area of accessible and assistive ICT with a view to identifying Research & Development gaps and emerging trends and generating a research agenda roadmap. | |||
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br> | <u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br> | ||
'''What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?''' | '''What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?''' | ||
In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received | In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> |
edits