Planetary Dialogue SDDP on Rescuing the Enlightment: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SDD_Report | |||
|acronym=SDDP ObamaVision | |||
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | |||
|report_title= SDDP ObamaVision | |||
|Triggering_Question= "In the context of Obama's vision for engaging stakeholders from all walks of life in a bottom-up democracy employing Internet technology, what factors do we anticipate, on the basis of our experiences with SDDP, will emerge as inhibitors to the actualization of his vision?" | |||
|project= | |||
|author= [[Aleco Christakis]]<br> [[Gayle Underwood]] | |||
|editor= [[Yiannis Laouris]] | |||
|total_duration=3 weeks | |||
|stats=Participants=17 <br> Number of ideas=59 <br>Number of Clusters=13 <br> Ideas received Votes=41 <br> Ideas on MAP R=13 <br>Spreathink ST=66,6% <br>Situational Complexity SCI= | |||
|dates=15 November, 13 December 2008 | |||
|link=[[Media:Planetary_SUMMARYREPORTCOLABIJUNE2007.pdf|Download Report]]<br>[[Media:Ozbekhan_PhilanthropolisApril23.pdf|Download Pre-Report]] | |||
}} | |||
| Line 14: | Line 28: | ||
Cluster 8: HUMAN NATURE | Cluster 8: HUMAN NATURE | ||
Cluster 9: MARGINALIZATION | Cluster 9: MARGINALIZATION | ||
[[File: RescuingEnlightment_SDDP_2016_MAP.png |thumbnail|center|500px|alt=Influence MAP]] | |||
==List of Ideas== | ==List of Ideas== | ||
Revision as of 07:35, 20 July 2022
|
Triggering Question
What factors will help significantly in rescuing the enlightment from its failings?
Clusters
Cluster 1: CLARIFICATION OF TERMS Cluster 2: AUTHENTICITY Cluster 3: SENSITIVITY Cluster 4: ACCOUNTABILITY Cluster 5: HOSPITALITY Cluster 6: METHODOLOGY Cluster 7: INCLUSIVITY Cluster 8: HUMAN NATURE Cluster 9: MARGINALIZATION
List of Ideas
- Idea 1: IDENTIFY SUCCESS (Denise)
- Idea 2: TRUST (Denise)
- Idea 3: USE PATTERNS OF FAILURE AND SUCCESS (Denise)
- Idea 4: CONTACT WITH THOSE IN NEED (Geoff)
- Idea 5: TRANSPARENCY TO BUILD TRUST (Geoff)
- Idea 6: PROMISE KEEPING (Geoff)
- Idea 7: RELINQUISHING POWER (Geoff)
- Idea 8: HOSPITALITY (Geoff)
- Idea 9: EXPANDED NOTION OF ACCOUNTABILITY (Janet)
- Idea 10: RESPECTFUL COMMUNICATION (Janet)
- Idea 11: EXPANDING CONSCIOUNESS TO SEE CONNECTIONS ACROSS CONCEPTUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL AND SPATIAL BOUNDARIES (Janet)
- Idea 12: IMPROVING THE PROCESS OF RESEARCH AND MAKINGIT MORE DISCURSIVE AND ACCESSIBLE AND OPEN TO THE IDEAS OF OTHERS (Janet)
- Idea 13: IMPROVING THE CAPACITY OF POLICY MAKERS AND POLITICIANS TO BE INCLUSIVE (Janet)
- Idea 14: IMPROVING LOCAL GOVERNANCE USING LOCAL KNOWLEDGE (Jim)
- Idea 15: OPTIMISM AND PESSIMISM (Jim)
- Idea 16: HUMAN NATURE (Jim)
- Idea 17: METHODOLOGY (Jon)
- Idea 18: COMMUNICATION (Jon)
- Idea 19: CAPACITY (Jon)
- Idea 20: PARTNERSHIPS (Jon)
- Idea 21: RESPONSIBILITY (Jon)
- Idea 22: MIND OPENING (Paisal)
- Idea 23: BRAIN TRIGGERING (Paisal)
- Idea 24: LOOKING INSIDE (Paisal)
- Idea 25: ENABLING PEOPLE'S CAPACITY (Paisal)
- Idea 26: CORRECTING THE FAILINGS (Paisal)
- Idea 27: ENABLING STREET TRADERS TO HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON THE POLICY PERTAINING TO GOVERNANCE OF
INFORMAL STREET TRADERS (Sudarmo)
- Idea 28: CORRUPTION AND LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN MANAGING THE DAILY TOLLS COLLECTED BY THE OFFICIAL FROM THE STREET TRADERS (Sudarmo)
- Idea 29: ADVOCACY TO SUPPORT THE STREET TRADERS (Sudarmo)
- Idea 30: MARGINALIZATION OF SOME TRADERS BECAUSE OF COMPETITION FOR SCARCE RESOURCES (Sudarmo)
- Idea 31: TOP DOWN PLANNING BY THE GOVERNMENT THAT FOCUSES ON CITY AESTHETICS OR BEAUTY AND NOT ON THE WELFARE OF THE STREET VENDORS (Sudarmo)
- Idea 32: USING RELEVANT LANGUAGE TO STAKEHOLDERS (Vu)
- Idea 33: PARTICIPATING STAKEHOLDERS (Vu)
- Idea 34: BEING RESPONSIVE TO STAKEHOLDERS TO AVOID FORMALISM CONSULTATIONS (Vu)
- Idea 35: LEAVING OUT 'POWER ABUSED' ON THE DIALOGUE (Vu)
- Idea 36: CONDUCTING PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH (Vu)
- Idea 37: WE MUST BETTER DEFINE WHAT WE MEAN BY TWO KEY WORDS: 'ENLIGHTENMENT' and 'ITS FAILINGS' (John)
- Idea 38: WE WANT TO REFER TO THE ENLIGHTENMENT AND ITS FAILINGS (John)
- Idea 39: SETTING AND OBSERVANCE OF RULES OF MUTUAL RESPECT, FOR OTHERS, OTHER VIEWS, NON-HUMAN CONSIDERATIONS AND FUTURE GENERATIONS (Rob)
- Idea 40: MORE INFORMED UNDERSTANDING OF AND COMMITMENT TO CIVIL SOCIETY, IE IN THIS CASE, THE NOTION THAT AS AN INDIVDUAL, ONE HAS BOTH RIGHTS TO BE HEARD AND OBLIGATIONS TO LISTEN AND ACCEPT THE VIEWS OF OTHERS, AND TO ACCEPT THAT SOME POLICY DECISIONS CANNOT FULFILL EVERY INDIVIDUAL'S NEEDS OR WANTS (Rob)
- Idea 41: AN OBLIGATION ON ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS IN CONSULTATIVE PROCESSES TO BE FULLY (OR MORE) INFORMED, RATHER THAN 'COME AS YOU ARE' (Rob)
- Idea 42: FOCUS PARTICIPATIVE PROCESSES AROUND DIRECTIONS AND PRIORITIES IN RELATION TO 'CONUNDRUMS', RATHER THAN 'POPULAR VOTE ON SPECIFIC PROPOSITIONS' (Rob)
- Idea 43: DEMONSTRATE ATTITUDES AND PROCESSES THAT REBUILD OR COUNTER-ACT THE (PERCEIVED) DECLINING TRUST IN GOVERNMENTS AS REPRESENTATIVE DECISION-MAKERS, AND ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO ACTIVELY CONTRIBUTE DESPITE THEIR CYNICISM (Rob)
- Idea 44: NEED TO CHANGE ATTITUDE BOTH MEN AND WOMEN'S PART (Nadira)
- Idea 45: NEED TO AMEND THE EXISTING LAW (Nadira)
- Idea 46: COMPENSATION SHOULD BE MADE TO THE VICTIM (Nadira)
- Idea 47: A SUPPORT CENTRE SHOULD BE INTRODUCED TO DISTRIBUTE PROPERTY (Nadira)
- Idea 48: ENSURE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF EXISTING LAW (Nadira)
- Idea 49: GENERAL COMMENTS FROM PARTICIPANTS
