175
edits
SDDP URVT 19 12 2008: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
asylum to stakeholders <br> | asylum to stakeholders <br> | ||
[[File:URVT- | [[File:URVT- SDDP1.jpg|thumb|center|upright=5.0|alt=MAP for SDDP URVT.|Influence MAP for SDDP URVT.]] | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
The workshop will be conducted through the methodology of "Structured Dialogic Design Process" (Structured Dialogic Design Process, SDDP) known as Structured Democratic Dialogue. The SDDP allows the team involved to discuss an issue with a structured and democratic way that allows us to achieve practical results. It is a deeply reasoned, scientific, psycho-social methodology has evolved over the past 30 years in its current form. Helps build consensus and solve complex problems. | The workshop will be conducted through the methodology of "Structured Dialogic Design Process" (Structured Dialogic Design Process, SDDP) known as Structured Democratic Dialogue. The SDDP allows the team involved to discuss an issue with a structured and democratic way that allows us to achieve practical results. It is a deeply reasoned, scientific, psycho-social methodology has evolved over the past 30 years in its current form. Helps build consensus and solve complex problems. | ||
The workshops | The SDDP workshops contribute the following ways: | ||
* To help participants reach a common understanding of the problem. | * To help participants reach a common understanding of the problem. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
* to establish lasting ties based on respect, trust, and cooperation. | * to establish lasting ties based on respect, trust, and cooperation. | ||
The workshops | The SDDP workshops achieve these results through respecting the autonomy of all participants and the use of a toolkit consensus including discipline, technology, and graphics ideas that allow participants to control the discussion. The SDDP methodology developed to help understand and solve complex social systems (complex societal systems). It has been adopted successfully around the world in situations of uncertainty and conflict. At European level, the method has been used by four European networks of experts with participation of about 20 countries each time. | ||
== Organizers and partners== | == Organizers and partners== | ||
