Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the Problématique: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the Problématique (view source)

Revision as of 06:21, 22 July 2022

360 bytes removed ,  22 July 2022
change of template
(Created page with "{{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> |acronym=Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the problématique ...")
 
(change of template)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->
{{SDD_Report                                           
|acronym=Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the problématique                       <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
  |acronym= Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the problématique                      
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg     <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          appropriate content-->
  |book_image= SDDP_Report_Image.jpg
|report_title= Final Report of SDDP Co-Laboratory "How Do We Engage Educators?" <!-- if a variable left empty e.g " report_title =" or not used  at all then it will not appear on the template -->
  |report_title= Final Report of SDDP Co-Laboratory "How Do We Engage Educators?"
|Triggering_Question=What are obstacles that prevent us from engaging educators?
  |project= [[Cyberethics: Cyprus Safer Internet Center]]
|project=[[Cyberethics: Cyprus Safer Internet Center]]
  |Triggering_Question= What are obstacles that prevent us from engaging educators?
|author=
  |location=
|editor=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Tatjana Taraszow]]
  |dates= September 17-19, 2007
|total_duration=4 hours
  |LeadFacilitator=
|stats=Participants=20 <br>  Number of ideas=70  <br>Number of Clusters= <br> Ideas received Votes=21  <br> Ideas on MAP R=14  <br>Spreathink  ST=   
  |AsFacilitator=
|dates=September 17-19, 2007
  |author=
|link=http://www.saferinternet.org  
  |editor= [[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Tatjana Taraszow]]  
  |total_duration= 4 hours
  |stats= Participants=20 <br>  Number of ideas=70  <br>Number of Clusters= <br> Ideas received Votes=21  <br> Ideas on MAP R=14  <br>Spreathink  ST=   
  |isbn=
  |link= http://www.saferinternet.org  
}}
}}


Part of the [[Getting the Best out of our Insafe Network 2007 Co-Laboratories]].


==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==
For the first time ever, all Awareness Nodes of the EU Safer Internet project used the Structured Design Dialogue Process (SDDP) during their Insafe Training meeting which took place in Limassol, Cyprus September 17-19, 2007.  
For the first time ever, all Awareness Nodes of the EU Safer Internet project used the Structured Design Dialogue Process (SDDP) during their Insafe Training meeting which took place in Limassol, Cyprus September 17-19, 2007.
The two SDDP co-laboratories ‘Engaging Educators’ documented here built on experiences gained from previous relevant training sessions in Bruges and Stockholm as well as the results of the 6-month evaluations (Customer Satisfaction Surveys) performed by the coordinating node.
The two SDDP co-laboratories ‘Engaging Educators’ documented here built on experiences gained from previous relevant training sessions in Bruges and Stockholm as well as the results of the 6-month evaluations (Customer Satisfaction Surveys) performed by the coordinating node.
Two simultaneous running co-laboratories were dealing with the topic of engaging educators. Co-laboratory A explored the weaknesses of the current model of collaboration between nodes and educators, while co-laboratory B envisioned not only ideal means of engaging educators in the Internet Awareness Campaign but also envisioned the ideal collaboration model between nodes and educators. <br>
Two simultaneous running co-laboratories were dealing with the topic of engaging educators. Co-laboratory A explored the weaknesses of the current model of collaboration between nodes and educators, while co-laboratory B envisioned not only ideal means of engaging educators in the Internet Awareness Campaign but also envisioned the ideal collaboration model between nodes and educators. <br>
Line 25: Line 30:


<br>
<br>
[[File:Engaging_Educators_-_Defining_the_problématiqueMap.jpg|thumb|center|upright=3.0|alt=MAP for Insafe SDDP.|Educators – Problématique – Root Cause Map]]
[[File:Engaging Educators - Defining the problématiqueMap.jpg|center|thumb|upright=3.0|MAP for Insafe SDDP.|Educators – Problématique – Root Cause Map]]
<br>
<br>
The voting results were used to select factors for the subsequent structuring phase to identify inter-relations among the generated factors. The 14 factors were structured within four levels and are related according to the influence they exert on each other.
The voting results were used to select factors for the subsequent structuring phase to identify inter-relations among the generated factors. The 14 factors were structured within four levels and are related according to the influence they exert on each other.
Retrieved from "https://futureworlds.eu/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/10637...26048"

Navigation menu