5,693
edits
CARDIAC: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
→Project Reports: 4.1
No edit summary |
(→Project Reports: 4.1) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
€499,991.00 (Total Budget) | €499,991.00 (Total Budget) | ||
|partners=[[Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne]]<br>[[Central Remedial Clinic]]<br>[[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute]]<br>[[Universidad del País Vasco]]<br>[[Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche]]<br>[[Evangelische Stiftung Volmarstein]]<br>[[John Gill Technology Ltd.]]<br>[[Smart Homes]]<br>[[University of Oslo]]<br>[[Technion - Israel Institute of Technology]]<br>[[Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas]]<br>[[Univesdidad De Sevilla]]<br>[[Universidade Technica De Lisboa]]<br>Associate partners:<br>[[GSA Information Consultants]] | |partners=[[Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne]]<br>[[Central Remedial Clinic]]<br>[[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute]]<br>[[Universidad del País Vasco]]<br>[[Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche]]<br>[[Evangelische Stiftung Volmarstein]]<br>[[John Gill Technology Ltd.]]<br>[[Smart Homes]]<br>[[University of Oslo]]<br>[[Technion - Israel Institute of Technology]]<br>[[Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas]]<br>[[Univesdidad De Sevilla]]<br>[[Universidade Technica De Lisboa]]<br>Associate partners:<br>[[GSA Information Consultants]] | ||
|website= | |website= | ||
}} | }} | ||
The CARDIAC project aspired to develop a series of roadmaps for future research and development in the area of accessible and assistive information and communication technology systems by inviting relevant stakeholders and experts from across Europe to participate in three [[Structured Dialogic Design Process|Structured Dialogic Design Processes]]. | The CARDIAC project aspired to develop a series of roadmaps for future research and development in the area of accessible and assistive information and communication technology systems by inviting relevant stakeholders and experts from across Europe to participate in three [[Structured Dialogic Design Process|Structured Dialogic Design Processes]]. | ||
The particular focus | The particular focus was on: | ||
* inclusive human-machine interactions | * inclusive human-machine interactions | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Various techniques are being used including [[Structured Dialogic Design Process|Structure Democratic Dialogues]], Wiki discussion groups, experts' opinion and analysis of internally produced and external data, as well as direct contact with key players. | Various techniques are being used including [[Structured Dialogic Design Process|Structure Democratic Dialogues]], Wiki discussion groups, experts' opinion and analysis of internally produced and external data, as well as direct contact with key players. | ||
===Importance=== | |||
The CARDIAC dialogues were very influential for the domain of Accessible & Assistive ICT because they have been used by the EC to choose and draft calls for proposals for Priority 7 of FP7, thus influencing the distribution of about 7 billion euros. | |||
===Geographic Coverage=== | |||
* Switzerland | |||
* Cyprus | |||
* United Kingdom | |||
* Spain | |||
* Portugal | |||
* Israel | |||
* Italy | |||
* Germany | |||
* Norway | |||
* Greece | |||
===Links to the original Results=== | |||
The results of the dialogues of the project are available as follows: | The results of the dialogues of the project are available as follows: | ||
| Line 65: | Line 81: | ||
Besides the application of such “solutions”, some industrial companies have established structures and procedures in their organisation that take care of accessibility aspects, be it a part of their product philosophy or just a matter of quality assurance. These can also include cooperation with other organisations from the same technological area, e.g. in associations like DIGITAL EUROPE, with research organisations, with user oriented organisations or with assistive technology companies. | Besides the application of such “solutions”, some industrial companies have established structures and procedures in their organisation that take care of accessibility aspects, be it a part of their product philosophy or just a matter of quality assurance. These can also include cooperation with other organisations from the same technological area, e.g. in associations like DIGITAL EUROPE, with research organisations, with user oriented organisations or with assistive technology companies. | ||
==Related Publications== | |||
* Laouris, Y., Michaelides, M. and Sapio, M. (2008). A systemic evaluation of obstacles preventing the wider public benefiting from and participating in the broadband society. In Pierson, j., Mante-Meijer, E., Loos, E. and Sapio B. Innovating for and by users, Brussels: COST Action 298. Chapter 14: 171-180. | |||
* Laouris, Y. and Michaelides, M. (2007). What obstacles prevent practical broad-band applications from being produced and exploited? In: Towards an inclusive future Impact and wider potential of information and communication technologies, Roe Patrick (Ed), European cooperation in science and technology. Chapter 7: 281-299. Available on-line: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c8297d4c-4f84-4651-8832-04ba3511a575 | |||
* Roe, P., Gill, J., Allen, B., Boyle, B., Heck., H., Siitta, G., Laouris, Y. (2011). Towards a technology transfer roadmap from the Coordination Action in R&D in Accessible and Assistive ICT (CARDIAC). Technology and Disability 23, 171–181 DOI 10.3233/TAD-2011-0325. | |||
* Laouris, Y., Siita, G, Roe, P., Emiliani, P-L., Christakis, A. (2011). Virtual Structured Dialogic Design as Tool for Analysis of Threats before Implementing European Dialogues Aiming to Identify R&D Gaps in Assistive ICT. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.): Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2011, LNCS 6765, pp. 492–497, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. | |||
* Laouris, Y., Emiliani, P. L., & Roe, P. (2017). Systemic evaluation of actions toward developing practical broadband applications for elderly and people with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16, 247-255. | |||
==Dissemination== | ==Dissemination== | ||
| Line 75: | Line 100: | ||
==Project Reports== | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D1_2.pdf|Download CARDIAC D1.2 Production of Accessible & Assistive ICT Systems and Materials]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_TechnologfyTransfer_D2-1_SDDP_1_Paphos.pdf|Download CARDIAC D2.1 Paphos Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_InclusiveHCI_d2_SanSebastian.pdf|Download CARDIAC D2.2 San Sebastian Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D2.3_Florence_Report.pdf|Download CARDIAC D2.3 Florence Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_d3.1_Final.pdf|Download CARDIAC D3.1 Final Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D3_2.pdf|Download CARDIAC D3 2 Trends on Inclusive User Interface Design]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D4_1.pdf|Download CARDIAC D4.1 Materials needed to support the SDDP-3 meeting]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D4.2_final.pdf|Download CARDIAC D4.2 Final Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D5.4_Final.pdf|Download CARDIAC D5.4 Final Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D6_4.pdf|Download CARDIAC D6 4.pdf 4th Bi-annual Progress Report]] | |||
==SDDPs== | ==SDDPs== | ||
