SDDP Act Beyond Borders Vision Building in Larnaca in 2010: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==
This report has been developed in the context of the [[CARDIAC]] project (FP7 - Coordinating Action: Grant Agreement 248582). The goal of the project is to create a platform that can bring together the various stakeholders in the area of accessible and assistive ICT with a view to identifying Research & Development gaps and emerging trends and generating a research agenda roadmap.
This report was prepared in the context of the project “Human Rights and Reconciliation – Civil Society Acts Beyond Borders’.


The project brought together stakeholders from Israel and the Palestinian Territories with the view of facilitating the peaceful conciliation and management of group interests and promoting solutions on divisive matters or controversial areas.
The participants of the SDD co-laboratory are:
Abeer George Youssef Awwad - Palestinian
Aia Harel - Israeli
Anat Romberg - Israeli
Dar Nadler - Israeli
David Swissa - Israeli
Erez Naar - Israeli
Hana Azmi Al-Atrash - Palestinian
Husam Hussein m. almeghari - Palestinian
Itamar Tas - Israeli
Iyad  m. a. faqih - Palestinian
Jehonatan Golany - Israeli
Karin Reingewertz- Israeli
Lior Reshef Deri- Israeli
Majd Jammal - Palestinian
Manal Isam Ali Ghaben - Palestinian
Qais Osama Abdel rahman Maghary - Palestinian
Roi Shindler - Israeli
Shadi ahmad Abdullah alassi - Palestinian
Simon Dabit - Palestinian
Yasmin Celine Confino - Israeli
Ziyad mohmd mohmd alaydi - Palestinian




<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br>
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br>
'''What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?'''
'''“What are descriptors of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians?'''


In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 69 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 6 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the 'Tree of Influence' shown below. <br>


<br>
<br>

Navigation menu