E-Hoop SDDP Greece: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->
{{SDD_Report                                           
|acronym=E-Hoop SDDP Greece                     <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
  |acronym= E-Hoop SDDP Greece                
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg     <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the appropriate content-->
  |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg  
|report_title= [[SDDP e-Hoop]] <!-- if a variable left empty e.g " report_title =" or not used  at all then it will not appear on the template -->
  |report_title= [[SDDP e-Hoop]]  
|Triggering_Question= "What are typical obstacles that limit learners from benefiting maximally from their respective educational institutions because of their differences?"  
  |project= [[E-Hoop]]
|project=[[E-Hoop]]
  |Triggering_Question= "What are typical obstacles that limit learners from benefiting maximally from their respective educational institutions because of their differences?"  
|author= [[Elena Aristodemou]]<br> [[Aliki Economidou]] <br> [[Chrystalla Miltiadou]]  
  |location=
|editor= [[Yiannis Laouris]]
  |dates= 10 March 2014
|total_duration=12 person hrs
  |LeadFacilitator=
|stats=Participants=8 <br> Number of ideas=24  <br>Number of Clusters=5 <br> Ideas received Votes=19  <br> Ideas on MAP R=9  <br>Spreathink  ST=74%  <br>Situational Complexity  SCI=2,3%  
  |AsFacilitator=
|dates=10 March 2014
  |author= [[Elena Aristodemou]]<br> [[Aliki Economidou]] <br> [[Chrystalla Miltiadou]]  
|link=http://www.e-hoop.info/
  |editor= [[Yiannis Laouris]]
  |total_duration= 12 person hrs
  |stats= Participants=8 <br> Number of ideas=24  <br>Number of Clusters=5 <br> Ideas received Votes=19  <br> Ideas on MAP R=9  <br>Spreathink  ST=74%  <br>Situational Complexity  SCI=2,3%
  |isbn=
  |link= http://www.e-hoop.info/
}}
}}


Line 16: Line 20:
==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==


The Structured Dialogic Design co-laboratories are organized with aim to analyze the needs of the intended users with respect to their learning needs, as well as their needs with regards to the e-Hoop platform. The intention is to identify obstacles that prevent learners from benefiting maximally from their current educational institution due to differences (disabilities, socioeconomic background etc.), using the Structured Dialogic Design Process (SDDP).
The [[Structured Democratic Dialogue]] [[Co-Laboratory|co-laboratories]] were organized with aim to analyze the needs of the intended users with respect to their learning needs, as well as their needs with regards to the [[E-Hoop]] project platform. The intention was to identify obstacles that prevent learners from benefiting maximally from their current educational institution due to differences (disabilities, socioeconomic background etc.).
 
The [[Hellenic Open University]] organized on the 10th of March 2014 a [[Co-Laboratory]] in order to accumulate the collective wisdom of experts regarding the obstacles that limit learners from benefiting maximally from their respective educational institutions because of their differences. The [[Co-Laboratory]] was attended by 8 participants. The process was supported by [[Cogniscope 3]].


Youth Career and Advising Center (JKC) organized on the 10th of March 2014 a co-laboratory in order to accumulate the collective wisdom of experts regarding the obstacles that limit learners from benefiting maximally from their respective educational institutions because of their differences. The co-laboratory was attended by 8 participants.




Line 47: Line 52:


The workshop was mainly facilitated by [[Yiannis Laouris]] and [[Katerina Fotiou]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]).
The workshop was mainly facilitated by [[Yiannis Laouris]] and [[Katerina Fotiou]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]).
In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported their satisfaction that they had the opportunity to exchange ideas via the structured dialogue process which empowered them to identify the obstacles that can be a barrier to students to benefit on the maximum from the educational institutions due to their differences. <br>
In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported their satisfaction that they had the opportunity to exchange ideas via the structured dialogue process which empowered them to identify the obstacles that can be a barrier to students to benefit on the maximum from the educational institutions due to their differences. <br>


==Participants==
==Participants==
Line 72: Line 77:
|}
|}
<br>
<br>




Navigation menu