SDDP COST 219ter Obstacles to practical broadband applications: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
   |acronym=SDDP Obstacles to practical broadband applications                      <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
   |acronym=SDDP Obstacles to practical broadband applications                      <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
|book_image= SDDP_Report_Image.jpg    <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the content-->
|book_image= SDDP_Report_Image.jpg    <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the content-->
|report_title=A systemic evaluation of obstacles that prevent the development of practical applications
|report_title=A systemic evaluation of actions that the Cost219ter community can take to alleviate the obstacles that prevent the development of practical applications
|Triggering_Question=Considering the availability of powerful broadband technologies and the development of relevant scenarios, what are the obstacles that prevent us from producing practical applications?
|Triggering_Question=What obstacles prevent practical broadband applications from being produced and exploited?
|project=[[COST 219ter: Accessibility for all to services and terminals for next generation mobile networks]]
|project=[[COST 219ter: Accessibility for all to services and terminals for next generation mobile networks|COST 219ter]]
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Marios Michaelides]]
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]]
|editor= [[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Marios Michaelides]] <br> [[Patrick Roe]]
|editor= <br> [[Yiannis Laouris]] <br>[[Marios Michaelides]]  
|total_duration=2 days
|total_duration=2 days
|stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of ideas=55 <br>Number of Clusters=18 <br> Ideas received Votes=23 <br> Ideas on MAP R=19 <br>Spreathink  ST=40%  
|stats=Participants=26 <br> Number of ideas=64 <br>Number of Clusters=10 <br> Ideas received Votes=24 <br> Ideas on MAP R=18 <br>Spreathink  ST=32,2%  
|dates=2007
|dates=7th - 8th March 2006
|link=[[Media:Cost219terBook Ch7 LaourisMichaelides.pdf |Download Report]]
|link=[[Media:Cost219 Chapter 7 LaourisMichaelidesCleaned.pdf|Download Report]]
}}
}}




==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==
This report has been developed in the context of the [[COST 219ter: Accessibility for all to services and terminals for next generation mobile networks]] project (FP7 - Coordinating Action: Grant Agreement 248582). The goal of the project is to create a platform that can bring together the various stakeholders in the area of accessible and assistive ICT with a view to identifying Research & Development gaps and emerging trends and generating a research agenda roadmap.
This report has been developed in the context of the [[COST 219ter: Accessibility for all to services and terminals for next generation mobile networks|COST 219ter]] project. The results of two workshops are summarized below, that were held in Ayia Napa, Cyprus and in Seville, Spain. The purpose of the workshops was to develop a shared understanding regarding the obstacles that prevent the exploitation of broadband technologies and to build commitment within the COST 219ter community to an action agenda for collaboratively addressing the problem. The workshops were organized using the “Interactive Management” methodology.
 


==Facilitators==
* [[Yiannis Laouris]]
* [[Elia Petridou]]
* [[Marios Michaelides]]


<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br>
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br>
'''Considering the availability of powerful broadband technologies and the development of relevant scenarios, what are the obstacles that prevent us from producing practical applications?'''
'''What obstacles prevent practical broadband applications from being produced and exploited?'''


In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
In response to the TQ, the 26 participants came up with 64 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 24 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>


<br>
<br>
[[Fig7_Cost219Obstacles.jpg|thumb|center|upright=2.0|alt=MAP for COST 219ter Obstacles|Influence tree on the obstacles that prevent the development of practical applications]]
[[File:Fig7 Cost219Obstacles.jpg|thumb|center|upright=2.0|alt=MAP for Cost219 Obstacles.|Influence tree on the obstacles that prevent practical broadband applications from being produced and exploited.]]
<br>
<br>


According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristics appear to be the most influential  were: <br>
According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristics appear to be the most influential  were: <br>
* Mechanism #1, Big delay in decision making from the governmental side
* Factor #32: The difficulty of the 'handicap' community to agree on and to define what accessible products
* Factor #14: Poor connection between statements of user needs and specific design requirements
* Factor #60: The weakness of broad thinking from the disability lobbies
* Factor #50: Lack of understanding of the marketing potential
* Factor #31: The weakness of legislation and standards make it very difficult to motivate the mainstream industry
* Factor #1: Absence of common standards
* Factor #48: Lack of good market incentives or business models


The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> <br>
The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> <br>
The workshop was facilitated by [[Elena Aristodemou]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]), [[Aleco Christakis]] and [[Georgina Siitta Achilleos]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]).  
The workshop was facilitated by [[Yiannis Laouris]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]), [[Marios Michaelides]].  




Line 42: Line 45:
==External Links==
==External Links==


* [http://www.tiresias.org/cost219ter/ CAT219ter Website]  
* [http://www.tiresias.org/cost219ter/ Cost291ter Website]  


[[Category:Future Worlds Center Projects]]
[[Category:Future Worlds Center Projects]]
638

edits

Navigation menu