118
edits
R-I-Peers Rome SDDP Identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
R-I-Peers Rome SDDP Identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation (view source)
Revision as of 04:09, 13 February 2019
, 13 February 2019no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|link=write the Link | |link=write the Link | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> | |||
|acronym=<!-- Append to variable acronym the content acronym of the sdd report --> | |||
|book_image=Rome_SDD-Map_Practices.jpg <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the appropriate content--> | |||
|report_title= <!-- if a variable left empty e.g " report_title =" or not used at all then it will not appear on the template --> | |||
|Triggering_Question= “What existing practices can be identified to facilitate the development and implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in academia and research organisations?” | |||
|project|total_duration= | |||
|stats= | |||
|place=Rome | |||
}} | |||
__TOC__ | |||
==Executive Summary== | |||
The Mutual Learning workshop “Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation” was organised by [[Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche|CNR]], [[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute|CNTI]] and [[Asociacion - Centro de Investigacion Cooperativa en Nanociencias - CIC NANOGUNE (CIC nanoGUNE)|CIC nanoGUNE]] in the context of the project [[R&I PEERS]] funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, on November 7th in Rome, Italy. | |||
The workshop, which was realised using the participatory methodology of the Structured Democratic Dialogue (SDD), brought together fifteen (15) experts from the gender equality field representing universities, governmental and scientific bodies as well as enterprises to discuss the existing practices across Gender Equality Plans (GEPs). | |||
<br> | |||
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) of the workshop was: </u><br> | |||
'''"What existing practices can be identified to facilitate the development and implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in academia and research organisations?"''' | |||
In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 29 ideas, which were categorized in 4 clusters. Following the voting process, 22 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | |||
<br> | |||
[[File:Rome_SDD-Map_Practices.jpg |thumb|center|upright=4.0|400px|alt=MAP for MARINA Brussels MML.|Influence tree from the ideas generated at Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation Workshop]] | |||
<br> | |||
According to the participants of this workshop, the practices that appear to be the most influential were: <br> | |||
* Practice #6: (2 votes) Monitoring gender & diversity state-of-art, gathering gender disaggregated quantitative & qualitative data <br> | |||
* Practice #7: (6 votes) Collection of gender equality data from existing admin database <br> | |||
* Practice #16: (3 votes) Presence of females in the board to select new researchers <br> | |||
* Practice #26: (3 votes) Try to attract more males in Gender Equality Committees <br> | |||
* Practice #27: (4 votes) Introduce some basic gender curricula in STEM | |||
The workshop was facilitated by [[Andreas P. Andreou]]. | |||
==External Links== | |||
[http://ripeers.eu/ R&I PEERS] | |||
