Getting the Best out of our Insafe Network 2007 Co-Laboratories: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
A total of 7 SDDPs/Co-Laboratories with title '''Getting the Best out of our Network''' were organized in 2107 by the [[Cyberethics: Cyprus Safer Internet Center]] to support the Insafe network focus and improve its vision, mission and action plans. Representatives from all 27 Safer Internet Nodes across Europe participating in the [[Insafe Training Conference Limassol 2007]] have contributed their ideas. They were split in three groups, which participated in three parallel Co-laboratories:
A total of 7 SDDPs/Co-Laboratories with title '''Getting the Best out of our Network''' were organized in 2107 by the [[Cyberethics: Cyprus Safer Internet Center]] to support the Insafe network focus and improve its vision, mission and action plans. Representatives from all 27 Safer Internet Nodes across Europe participating in the [[Insafe Training Conference Limassol 2007]] have contributed their ideas. They were split in three groups, which participated in three parallel Co-laboratories:


===Focus on improving the Network===
Participants of Co-Laboratory A explored the weaknesses of the current model of interactions within the network.
Participants of Co-Laboratory A explored the weaknesses of the current model of interactions within the network.
# [[Insafe SDDP: Getting The Best Out Of Our Network - Problématique]]
# [[Insafe SDDP: Getting The Best Out Of Our Network - Problématique]]
Line 11: Line 12:
* [[Insafe SDDP: Getting The Best Out Of Our Network - Vision]]
* [[Insafe SDDP: Getting The Best Out Of Our Network - Vision]]
Triggering Question: What are descriptors that characterize an ideal, efficient network of EU safer internet nodes?
Triggering Question: What are descriptors that characterize an ideal, efficient network of EU safer internet nodes?


Participants of Co-Laboratory C generated action options to be taken to overcome the obstacles in order to achieve the ideal model of an Insafe network.
Participants of Co-Laboratory C generated action options to be taken to overcome the obstacles in order to achieve the ideal model of an Insafe network.
Line 17: Line 17:
Triggering Question: What actions can the current network of EU Safer Internet nodes take in order to reach the ideal and efficient network?
Triggering Question: What actions can the current network of EU Safer Internet nodes take in order to reach the ideal and efficient network?


 
===Focus on Educators]]
On the following days, the participants joined a few more parallel Co-Laboratories, which explored the following issues:
On the following days, the participants joined a few more parallel Co-Laboratories, which explored the following issues:


Line 24: Line 24:


# [[Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the ideal means and ideal collaboration model]]
# [[Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the ideal means and ideal collaboration model]]
Triggering Question:  
Triggering Question: What are descriptors of an ideal collaboration model between Nodes and educators?
 
 
==Focus on Mobile Operators===
[[Insafe SDDP: Mobile Operators and Self Regulation - Defining an Action Plan]]
Triggering Question: What initiatives or actions can Nodes take in order to encourage the mobile industry to take desired actions?
 


===Focus on improving Media exposure===
# [[Insafe SDDP: Achieving Max Media with Minimum Budget - Defining an Action Plan]]
# [[Insafe SDDP: Achieving Max Media with Minimum Budget - Defining an Action Plan]]
Triggering Question: What ideas and actions can nodes do to materialize achieving max media with limited budget?
Triggering Question: What ideas and actions can nodes do to materialize achieving max media with limited budget?
Ninja, Ninla, Bots, Bureaucrats, recentchangescleanup, Administrators
4,970

edits

Navigation menu