From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
816 bytes removed
, 19 July 2022
|
|
| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
|
| |
|
| The participants produced 35 ideas, which were clustered into 6 categories. | | The participants produced 35 ideas, which were clustered into 6 categories. |
| After voting for their top 5, 17 ideas received votes (indicating Spreathink = 40%), and 7 were structured.
| |
|
| |
| The following ideas made it to the root of the tree: <br>
| |
| Idea 3: (9 Votes) Lack/absence of a clear common goal for the group to work on <br>
| |
| Idea 2: (7 Votes) Moderator/facilitator <br>
| |
| Idea 5: (4 Votes) Inconsistency and incompatibility between group members (age, educational level and experience, etc.) <br>
| |
| Idea 20: (4 Votes) Conflict of interest <br>
| |
| Idea 13: (3 Votes) Not knowing the contents of the topics well <br>
| |
| Idea 35: (3 Votes) Some members might not have the appropriate knowledge and the skills for stakeholders’ dialogue <br>
| |
| Idea 1: (1 Votes) Logistical arrangements <br>
| |
|
| |
| The striking finding is that the group identified #2: Moderator/facilitator, as the most influential factor.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Visual Overview of List of Clusters== | | ==Visual Overview of List of Clusters== |
