5,690
edits
AER-V SDDP of the International Facilitators Training School 2022: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
AER-V SDDP of the International Facilitators Training School 2022 (view source)
Revision as of 03:00, 9 September 2022
, 9 September 2022no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|book_image= SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | |book_image= SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | ||
|report_title=AER-V SDDP of the International Facilitators Training School 2022 | |report_title=AER-V SDDP of the International Facilitators Training School 2022 | ||
|Triggering_Question= | |Triggering_Question=What would you consider as useful characteristics of a validation system for the EU projects' managers? | ||
|project=[[AER]] | |project=[[AER-V-Recommendations for international project managers competences recognition and validation for lifelong learning]] | ||
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Agnieszka]] | |author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Agnieszka Dadak]] | ||
|editor= [[Yiannis Laouris]] | |editor= [[Agnieszka Dadak]], [[Foundation of Alternative Educational Initiatives]], <br>[[Yiannis Laouris]], [[Future Worlds Center]]<br>[[Lorenza Lupini]] & [[Luca Bordoni]], [[COOSS Marche ONLUSC scpa]]<br>[[Hans Jorgen Vodsgaard]], [[Interfolk]]<br>[[Aron Weigl]], [[EDUCULT]]<br>[[Ana Caneiro]], [[Rightchallenge]] | ||
|total_duration=5 days | |total_duration=5 days | ||
|stats=Participants= | |stats=Participants=24 <br> Number of ideas=46 <br>Number of Clusters=13 <br> Ideas received Votes=25 <br> Ideas on First MAP R=9 <br>Spreathink ST=47% | ||
|dates=2022 | |dates=16-20 of May 2022 | ||
|link=XXXX | |link=XXXX | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[File:AER-V_Clusters.png|thumb|center|upright=2.0|alt=Clusters]] | [[File:AER-V_Clusters.png|thumb|center|upright=2.0|alt=Clusters]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
The following ideas received the most votes: | |||
* 8: (9 Votes) Simplicity-easy to understand and measure | |||
* 9: (9 Votes) Clear definitions/understandings of competences, skills and experiences | |||
* 14: (9 Votes) Flexibility that considers diversity of the civil society sector | |||
* 15: (8 Votes) Recognition of formal, non-formal and informal knowledge | |||
* 16: (8 Votes) Taking into account work experience in various areas | |||
* 6: (6 Votes) Taking into account the complexity of the individual personality | |||
* 17: (6 Votes) Evidence-based to achieve a recognised status in European Union | |||
* 2: (5 Votes) Not only theoretical but also practical | |||
* 26: (4 Votes) Validation through transparent procedures | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:AER-V_Map1.png|thumb|center|upright=2.0|alt=First MAP]] | [[File:AER-V_Map1.png|thumb|center|upright=2.0|alt=First MAP]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Level 1 = [8, 6, 16, 17]<br> | |||
Level 2 = [15]<br> | |||
Level 3 = [26, 2, 14]<br> | |||
Level 4 = [9]<br> | |||
The structuring process was continued in a smaller group, at the on-line, follow-up co-laboratory workshop that took place the 8th of July 2022. The analysis of influence was made adding also the ideas that received 3 and 2 votes. As the effect, the factors on the map were structured on 7 levels: | |||
Level 1 = [16, 6, 17, 1, 23]<br> | |||
Level 2 = [8, 15, 40]<br> | |||
Level 3 = [26, 7]<br> | |||
Level 4 = [33]<br> | |||
Level 5 = [14, 2]<br> | |||
Level 6 = [9]<br> | |||
Level 7 = [24]<br> | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 37: | Line 69: | ||
According to the participants of | According to this map the most influential idea that according to the collective wisdom of the participants needs to be addressed with priority is: | ||
Idea 24: The dimension of mission and purpose is crucial | |||
Clarification: The wanted validation system is not for project management in general, but more specific for project management in a civil society (3rd sector), where the value-driven approach is essential both for the NGOs and their volunteers contrary to the project management in the market area (2nd sector) where the economic rationality of profit is essential; and the public area (1st sector), where the bureaucratic rationality is essential. Even though many of the needed technical skills may be the same in the three sectors, the leadership competences in the third sector may need a more clear focus on the purpose and meaning of the activities, and the strategic competences may be aware of the importance of the content-related mission and purpose as the main driver to engage and motivate the volunteers who are active not as employees but as active citizens. | |||
The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> <br> | The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> <br> | ||
The workshop was facilitated by [[Yiannis Laouris]], [[Manon]], [[France]]. | The workshop was facilitated by [[Yiannis Laouris]], [[Manon]], [[France]]. | ||
