5,690
edits
SDDP CARDIAC I: Technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
SDDP CARDIAC I: Technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services (view source)
Revision as of 10:08, 17 January 2023
, 17 January 2023no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
The face-to-face part of the event lasted three days and was held between the 28-30th of October 2010 in Pafos, Cyprus. Two weeks ahead of the meeting the twenty participants were given the opportunity of submitting their initial responses to the Triggering Question via the CARDIAC Wikispace. Two remote sessions were then held after the meeting to complete the structuring using the software Elluminate LiveTM. The CARDIAC Wikispace was also used to gather further clarifications and analysis of the results. | The face-to-face part of the event lasted three days and was held between the 28-30th of October 2010 in Pafos, Cyprus. Two weeks ahead of the meeting the twenty participants were given the opportunity of submitting their initial responses to the Triggering Question via the CARDIAC Wikispace. Two remote sessions were then held after the meeting to complete the structuring using the software Elluminate LiveTM. The CARDIAC Wikispace was also used to gather further clarifications and analysis of the results. | ||
===Clustering=== | |||
In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
* Cluster 1: Technology transfer process | * Cluster 1: Technology transfer process | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
* Cluster 15: Marketing | * Cluster 15: Marketing | ||
===Voting=== | |||
The following * Ideas received votes: | The following * Ideas received votes: | ||
* Idea #17 (6 votes) Improve education and training about inclusion of people working in industry dealing | |||
with mainstream | * Idea #17 (6 votes) Improve education and training about inclusion of people working in industry dealing with mainstream | ||
* | * Idea #42 (5 votes) Accessibility criteria in public procurement policy | ||
* Idea #1 (4 votes) A mechanism to understand where Ideas fall over or go wrong in the supply chain | * Idea #1 (4 votes) A mechanism to understand where Ideas fall over or go wrong in the supply chain | ||
* Idea #49 (4 votes) New funding mechanism to assist in exploitation - commercial introduction phase | * Idea #49 (4 votes) New funding mechanism to assist in exploitation - commercial introduction phase | ||
| Line 70: | Line 71: | ||
* Idea #37 (2 votes) Improve the level of technological research in inclusion | * Idea #37 (2 votes) Improve the level of technological research in inclusion | ||
* Idea #7 (2 votes) Maximize potential user base for accessible products | * Idea #7 (2 votes) Maximize potential user base for accessible products | ||
* Idea #65 (2 votes) Define technical interfaces between mainstream products and assistive technology | * Idea #65 (2 votes) Define technical interfaces between mainstream products and assistive technology products | ||
products | |||
* Idea #44 (2 votes) Provide incentives to bring academia, industry and users together | * Idea #44 (2 votes) Provide incentives to bring academia, industry and users together | ||
* Idea #46 (2 votes) Provide accurate potential user data to developers | * Idea #46 (2 votes) Provide accurate potential user data to developers | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
* Idea #61 (2 votes) Analyze procurement methods in member states | * Idea #61 (2 votes) Analyze procurement methods in member states | ||
* Idea # 3 (2 votes) Accessibility filter in company product R&D process | * Idea # 3 (2 votes) Accessibility filter in company product R&D process | ||
* Idea #56 (2 votes) Better understanding of the process involving research, development and | * Idea #56 (2 votes) Better understanding of the process involving research, development and technology transfer in ICT | ||
technology transfer in ICT | |||
* Idea # 5 (1 votes) Focus on novel and creative designs | * Idea # 5 (1 votes) Focus on novel and creative designs | ||
* Idea #10 (1 votes) Studies that demonstrate the positive contribution of assistive and accessible ICT | * Idea #10 (1 votes) Studies that demonstrate the positive contribution of assistive and accessible ICT | ||
| Line 84: | Line 83: | ||
Out of the population of 87 proposed ideas, 47 received one or more votes. This is described scientifically by the parameter of Spreadthink4 or divergence (ST or D respectively), whose value in this case is 51% of disagreement. According to numerous studies, the average degree of spreadthink is 40%. Spreadthink is defined as (V-5)/(N-5) where N is the total number of ideas and V is the number of ideas that received one or more votes. | Out of the population of 87 proposed ideas, 47 received one or more votes. This is described scientifically by the parameter of Spreadthink4 or divergence (ST or D respectively), whose value in this case is 51% of disagreement. According to numerous studies, the average degree of spreadthink is 40%. Spreadthink is defined as (V-5)/(N-5) where N is the total number of ideas and V is the number of ideas that received one or more votes. | ||
===Mapping=== | |||
Two remote sessions were held after the meeting to complete the structuring using the software Elluminate LiveTM. This web conferencing program was developed by Elluminate Inc to implement synchronous events4. Elluminate “rents” out virtual rooms or vSpaces where virtual schools and businesses can hold classes and meetings. This virtual space was the means by which all participants got together in order to be able to work on the virtual SDDSM. The image of the SDD software Cogniscope could be viewed by all remote participants; functions such as raising hand, voting“yes” or “no”, video, and chatting made this virtual SDDSM possible. A screen-shot of this environment is shown in the next image. | |||
In this short video clip, [[Yiannis Laouris]] explains the setup for the virtual SDDP sessions. | |||
{| style="align:center" | {| style="align:center" | ||
| Line 93: | Line 94: | ||
|} | |} | ||
The following diagram depicts the Influence Map generated by the participants during the face-to-face meeting in Paphos, as well as during the additional short sessions that have taken place virtually in the following week. | |||
<br> | |||
[[File: CARDIAC_SDDP_1_Tech_Transfer_Paphos.png|thumb|center|upright=2.0|alt=MAP for CARDIAC III.|Influence tree on the mechanisms that would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services.]] | |||
<br> | |||
| Line 160: | Line 166: | ||
==Snapshots | ==Snapshots from the event== | ||
The following pictures document the use of the wiki to pre-collect ideas and clarifications, the Eluminate software used to conduct the virtual sessions after the face-to-face sessions and a screenshot with [[Tatjana Taraszow]] facilitating the process. | The following pictures document the use of the wiki to pre-collect ideas and clarifications, the Eluminate software used to conduct the virtual sessions after the face-to-face sessions and a screenshot with [[Tatjana Taraszow]] facilitating the process. | ||
