536
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
On the 17th of October 2010, [[Unit for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Torture (URVT) II|URVT]] Associates gathered at the [[Future Worlds Center]]'s premises in Nicosia, Cyprus to exchange ideas and knowledge in a collective and collaborative effort. | On the 17th of October 2010, [[Unit for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Torture (URVT) II|URVT]] Associates gathered at the [[Future Worlds Center]]'s premises in Nicosia, Cyprus to exchange ideas and knowledge in a collective and collaborative effort. | ||
===Introduction=== | |||
Follow up - brief presentation of the EU ERF Project to the URVT staff by Vicky Germanakou: cooperation with the partner European organizations: Baff from Germany, Primo Levi Association from France, Zebra from Austria, Equator from Netherlands, ICAR Foundation from Romania. | |||
Presentation of the different stages and general timeline of the Project – expectations | |||
Distribution of the explanatory readings regarding Team Day I to URVT staff | |||
Brief orientation by Andria on the Team Day I - context/ expectations – discussion | |||
Presentation of the relevant points made at the Kick off Meeting in Graz | |||
A general discussion followed in order to conclude on the most suitable cases for the study. The choice was based on the needs, complications and length of the cases. It was generally agreed that the most important for the study is to manifest in the largest possible extend the culture, methodology and structure of URVT services. | |||
Then it was decided that all staff should work as one group, with Andria and Constantina leading the conversation, reflecting on the actual operation of the Unit. | |||
===Plan for the day=== | |||
The day would first discuss thoroughly the two case studies, one after the other, guided by the structure that was provided through the Framework for Assessing Quality document in combination the Inventory of Working and Treatment Methods document, in harmony with the clarification/comment/guidelines provided by the internal evaluator/researcher and coordinating organization of the Project. Then adjust them in the relevant documents. | |||
=== | ===Case 1=== | ||
''Issues covered:'' | ''Issues covered:'' |
edits