155
edits
SDDP Civil Society Dialogue Obstacles: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
SDDP Civil Society Dialogue Obstacles (view source)
Revision as of 06:23, 7 March 2012
, 7 March 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> | {{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> | ||
|acronym=SDDP Civil Society Dialogue - Obstacles <!-- Append to variable acronym the content acronym of the sdd report --> | |||
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the appropriate content--> | |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the appropriate content--> | ||
|report_title=A Systemic Evaluation of the State of Affairs Following the Negative Outcome of the Referendum in Cyprus Using the Structured Dialogic Design Process <!-- if a variable left empty e.g " report_title =" or not used at all then it will not appear on the template --> | |||
|Triggering_Question=What factors contribute to the increasing gap between the two communities in Cyprus? | |Triggering_Question=What factors contribute to the increasing gap between the two communities in Cyprus? | ||
|project=[[Civil Society Dialogue]] | |||
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Marios Michaelides]] <br>[[Mustafa Damdalen]]<br> [[Romina Laouri]] <br>[[Derya Beyatli]] <br> [[Aleco Christakis]] | |||
|editor= | |||
|total_duration=218 person hrs | |||
|stats=Participants=22 <br>Number of ideas=120 <br>Number of Clusters=20 <br> Ideas received Votes=60 <br> Ideas on MAP R=20 <br>Spreathink ST=50% <br>Situational Complexity SCI=22,9 | |||
|dates=September December 2006 | |||
|link=[http://socialsystems.wikispaces.com/file/view/Laouris+Cyprus+Referendum.pdf Download Open Access] | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Executive Summary== | ==Executive Summary== | ||
This paper reports the results of the first of a series of co-laboratories organized by Cypriot peace pioneers 30 months after the negative outcome of the referendum concerning UN General Secretary’s plan for reunification of the island. The purpose of this | This paper reports the results of the first of a series of co-laboratories organized by Cypriot peace pioneers 30 months after the negative outcome of the referendum concerning UN General Secretary’s plan for reunification of the island. The purpose of this Co-Laboratory was to support a diverse group of disengaged and disappointed peace pioneers and activists representing Turkish and Greek communities of Cyprus develop a shared understanding of factors contributing to the perceived widening of the gap between the two divided communities in Cyprus. The co-laboratory was organized using the structured dialogic design process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication | ||
environment. The root causes contributing to the widening of the gap are discussed and are also compared with those identified during a similar co-laboratory employing the Interactive Management methodology 12 years earlier. | environment. The root causes contributing to the widening of the gap are discussed and are also compared with those identified during a similar co-laboratory employing the Interactive Management methodology 12 years earlier. | ||
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br> | <u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br> | ||
'''What factors contribute to the increasing gap between the two communities in Cyprus? ''' | '''What factors contribute to the increasing gap between the two communities in Cyprus?''' | ||
In response to the TQ, the 22 participants came up with 120 obstacles, which were categorized in 20 clusters. Following the voting process, 47 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | In response to the TQ, the 22 participants came up with 120 obstacles, which were categorized in 20 clusters. Following the voting process, 47 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
According to the participants of this Co-Laboratory, appear to be the most influential were: <br> | |||
According to the participants of | * Obstacle #72, Media as puppets of political parties <br> | ||
* | * Obstacle #47, The personal and financial interests of politicians and ordinary people on both sides <br> | ||
* | |||
