Faro Convention Labs: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "{{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> |acronym= Faro Convention Lab 2017 |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image...")
 
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
}}
}}


__TOC__


==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==
Line 19: Line 20:




<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Line 37: Line 37:




 
<br>
<br>
In response to the TQ, the participants came up with 20 characteristics, which were categorized in 6 clusters. Following the voting process,13 ideas received one or more votes and 10 ideas were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
In response to the TQ, the participants came up with 20 characteristics, which were categorized in 6 clusters. Following the voting process,13 ideas received one or more votes and 10 ideas were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>


[[File:Faro_Spain_Map.jpg |thumbnail|center|700px|alt=Influence Map.|]]
[[File:Faro_Spain_Map.jpg |thumbnail|center|700px|alt=Influence Map.|]]
<br>
<br>


According to the participants of this workshop, 2 challenges appear to be the most influential: <br>
According to the participants of this workshop, 2 challenges appear to be the most influential: <br>
Line 49: Line 52:


==Final Report==
==Final Report==





Revision as of 01:20, 5 July 2018

Faro Convention Lab 2017
Faro Convention Lab 2017
Triggering Question
Dates 17 and 18 May 2017
Author(s) Katerina Fotiou
Marios Michaelides
Total Duration 3 days
Statistics Participants=
Number of ideas=20
Number of Clusters=6
Ideas received Votes=13
Ideas on MAP R=10
Spreathink ST=??%



Executive Summary

The European Council invited Future Worlds Center to participate in the Faro Action Plan 2016-2017. This took place in Najera and St Millan (La Rioja), Spain.





SDDP

The Triggering Question(s) (TQ) was

What are the challenges we have to overcome to mobilise people?



Influence Map.




In response to the TQ, the participants came up with 20 characteristics, which were categorized in 6 clusters. Following the voting process,13 ideas received one or more votes and 10 ideas were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.

Influence Map.



According to the participants of this workshop, 2 challenges appear to be the most influential:

  • Challenge 6: The new position of citizens / civic education
  • Challenge 20: Cultural ethnic discrimination


Final Report