R-I-Peers Rome SDDP Identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
   |link=write the Link
   |link=write the Link
}}
}}
{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->
{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->
|acronym=R&I PEERS<!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
|acronym=R&I PEERS<!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->

Revision as of 03:35, 13 February 2019

write the Acronym
write the Acronym
Report Title write the Report Title
Project write the Project
Triggering Question Triggering Question
Location Location
Dates Dates
Lead Facilitator(s) write the Lead Facilitator(s)
Assistant Facilitator(s) write the Assistant Facilitator(s)
Author(s) write the Author(s)
Editor(s) write the Editor(s)
Total Duration write the Total Duration
Statistics Basic statistics
ISBN ISBN
Download write the Link




R&I PEERS
R&I PEERS
Report Title Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation
Project R&I PEERS
Triggering Question “What existing practices can be identified to facilitate the development and implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in academia and research organisations?”
Dates 7th November 2018
Total Duration 9 person hrs
Statistics Participants=15
Number of ideas=29
Number of Clusters=4
Ideas received Votes=22
Ideas on MAP R=15




Executive Summary

The Mutual Learning workshop “Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation” was organised by CNR, CNTI and CIC nanoGUNE in the context of the project R&I PEERS funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, on November 7th in Rome, Italy.

The workshop, which was realised using the participatory methodology of the Structured Democratic Dialogue (SDD), brought together fifteen (15) experts from the gender equality field representing universities, governmental and scientific bodies as well as enterprises to discuss the existing practices across Gender Equality Plans (GEPs).


The Triggering Question (TQ) of the workshop was:

"What existing practices can be identified to facilitate the development and implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in academia and research organisations?"

In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 29 ideas, which were categorized in 4 clusters. Following the voting process, 22 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.


MAP for MARINA Brussels MML.
Influence tree from the ideas generated at Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation Workshop


According to the participants of this workshop, the practices that appear to be the most influential were:

  • Practice #6: (2 votes) Monitoring gender & diversity state-of-art, gathering gender disaggregated quantitative & qualitative data
  • Practice #7: (6 votes) Collection of gender equality data from existing admin database
  • Practice #16: (3 votes) Presence of females in the board to select new researchers
  • Practice #26: (3 votes) Try to attract more males in Gender Equality Committees
  • Practice #27: (4 votes) Introduce some basic gender curricula in STEM

The workshop was facilitated by Andreas P. Andreou.


External Links

R&I PEERS