5,715
edits
→Visual Overview of Mapping
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Visual Overview of Mapping== | ==Visual Overview of Mapping== | ||
After voting for their top 5, 17 ideas received votes (indicating Spreathink = 40%), and 7 were structured. | |||
[[File:Map_Bees_Clusters(Training)-MAP.png|thumbnail|center|700px|alt=Influence MAP]] | [[File:Map_Bees_Clusters(Training)-MAP.png|thumbnail|center|700px|alt=Influence MAP]] | ||
The following ideas made it to the root of the tree: <br> | |||
Idea 3: (9 Votes) Lack/absence of a clear common goal for the group to work on <br> | |||
Idea 2: (7 Votes) Moderator/facilitator <br> | |||
Idea 5: (4 Votes) Inconsistency and incompatibility between group members (age, educational level and experience, etc.) <br> | |||
Idea 20: (4 Votes) Conflict of interest <br> | |||
Idea 13: (3 Votes) Not knowing the contents of the topics well <br> | |||
Idea 35: (3 Votes) Some members might not have the appropriate knowledge and the skills for stakeholders’ dialogue <br> | |||
Idea 1: (1 Votes) Logistical arrangements <br> | |||
The striking finding is that the group identified #2: Moderator/facilitator, as the most influential factor. | |||
==Participants== | ==Participants== | ||