TAX - VAT Merging: 2nd SDDP: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(change of template) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SDD_Report | {{SDD_Report | ||
|acronym=2nd SDDP TAX - VAT Merging | |acronym= 2nd SDDP TAX - VAT Merging | ||
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | ||
|report_title= [[SDDP TAX - VAT Merging]] | |report_title= [[SDDP TAX - VAT Merging]] | ||
| | |project= [[Merging of TAX - VAT Units in Cyprus]] | ||
|Triggering_Question= "What are the expectations from the merging of the Inland Revenue Department and Value Added Tax (VAT) in a single organization?" | |||
|Triggering_Question= "What are the expectations from the merging of the Inland Revenue Department and Value Added Tax (VAT) in a single organization?" | |location= Lefkosia, Cyprus | ||
| | |dates= 14 November - 15 November 2013 | ||
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Chrystalla Miltiadou]] | |LeadFacilitator= [[Marios Michaelides]] <br> [[Yiannis Laouris]] | ||
|editor= | |AsFacilitator= | ||
|total_duration=12 person hrs | |author= [[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Chrystalla Miltiadou]] | ||
|stats=Participants=12 <br> Number of ideas=67 <br>Number of Clusters=11 <br> Ideas received Votes=50 <br> Ideas on MAP R=22 <br>Spreathink ST=29% <br>Situational Complexity SCI=4,45 | |editor= | ||
| | |total_duration= 12 person hrs | ||
|link=[[Merging of TAX - VAT Services in Cyprus]] | |stats= Participants=12 <br> Number of ideas=67 <br>Number of Clusters=11 <br> Ideas received Votes=50 <br> Ideas on MAP R=22 <br>Spreathink ST=29% <br>Situational Complexity SCI=4,45 | ||
|isbn= | |||
|link= [[Merging of TAX - VAT Services in Cyprus]] | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File: | [[File:TAX - VAT Merging 2st SDDP.jpg|Influence tree from the challenges 2nd SDDP of the TAX - VAT Merging workshop for TQ.|700px]] | ||
<br> | <br/> | ||
According to the participants of this workshop, the expectations that appeared to be the most influential were: <br> | According to the participants of this workshop, the expectations that appeared to be the most influential were: <br> | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
The workshop was | The workshop was facilitated by [[Marios Michaelides]] and [[Yiannis Laouris]]. <br> | ||
In sum, the way expectations are structured on the influence tree shows that the majority of the participants expect that the unification of the two tax departments will finally combat tax evasion and increase tax collection capacity. In order to achieve those two expectations, the new organization should undertake a series of actions that the participants consider important and useful: | In sum, the way expectations are structured on the influence tree shows that the majority of the participants expect that the unification of the two tax departments will finally combat tax evasion and increase tax collection capacity. In order to achieve those two expectations, the new organization should undertake a series of actions that the participants consider important and useful: | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
3. Internal Organization and Personnel Issues | 3. Internal Organization and Personnel Issues | ||
The co-laboratory showed that the external partners consider their involvement in decision making, designing and setting the taxation policy crucial.<br> | The co-laboratory showed that the external partners consider their involvement in decision making, designing and setting the taxation policy crucial.<br> | ||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
Latest revision as of 06:21, 25 July 2022
|
Executive Summary
During the period 7-19 November, the project team , in collaboration with the Cyprus Academy of Public Administration (CAPA), conducted three consultation meetings - workshops with all interested stakeholders in-order to analyse the smooth transition of merging the IRD and VAT Services. For the second Structured Democratic Dialogue Process co-laboratory twelve representatives from business, auditing, legal and other business associations and bodies participated in an SDDP, which took place 14-15 of November (total 12 hours) at the CAPA premises, with primary target to define their Expectations from the new system.
The Triggering Question (TQ) of the second workshop was:
"What are the expectations from the merging of the Inland Revenue Department and Value Added Tax (VAT) in a single organization?"
In response to the TQ, the 12 participants came up with 67 challenges, which were categorized in 11 clusters. Following the voting process, 50 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.
According to the participants of this workshop, the expectations that appeared to be the most influential were:
- Expectation #65 Participation of business representatives in decision-making
- Expectation #66 Continuation of the practice of regular contacts between professional bodies and tax authorities for practical application of the legislation
- Expectation #67 Engagement of professional associations of accountants in the planning and the determination of the tax policy
- Expectation #1 Simplification of the procedures and regulations during the consolidation
- Expectation #4 Procedures modernization and transparency
- Expectation #58 Placement of specialized trained officers in dealing with items of their specialization
- Expectation #59 Specialized Departments
The workshop was facilitated by Marios Michaelides and Yiannis Laouris.
In sum, the way expectations are structured on the influence tree shows that the majority of the participants expect that the unification of the two tax departments will finally combat tax evasion and increase tax collection capacity. In order to achieve those two expectations, the new organization should undertake a series of actions that the participants consider important and useful:
1. Extraversion with the configuration of communication channels, collaboration and involvement of the business community in planning and decision making 2. Orderly Operation with the simplification and modernization of procedures and transparency 3. Internal Organization and Personnel Issues
The co-laboratory showed that the external partners consider their involvement in decision making, designing and setting the taxation policy crucial.
