Wine Villages Cyprus Series of SDDPs: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SDD_Report | {{SDD_Report | ||
|acronym=SDDP | |acronym=SDDP | ||
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | ||
|report_title= | |report_title= Promoting place-based development in declining areas; The SDD process as a tool of participatory planning; case study of the Limassol wine villages local development pilot project | ||
|LeadFacilitator=[[Marios Michaelides]] | |LeadFacilitator=[[Marios Michaelides]] | ||
|AsFacilitator=[[Saviddes]]<br | |AsFacilitator=[[Vasos Saviddes]]<br[[CAPA girl]]<br>[[Yiannis Laouris]] | ||
|Triggering_Question= " | |Triggering_Question= "Ποιά εμπόδια πρέπει να ξεπεραστούν για την ανάπτυξη των Κρασοχωρίων?" | ||
|project=[[]] | |project=[[CAPA projects]] | ||
|author=[[Marios Michaelides]] | |author=[[Marios Michaelides]] | ||
|editor= [[Marios Michaelides]] | |editor= [[Marios Michaelides]] | ||
|total_duration= | |total_duration=8 hours | ||
|stats=Participants= | |stats=Participants=26 <br> Number of ideas=71? <br>Number of Clusters=8 <br> Ideas received Votes=?? <br> Ideas on MAP R=?? <br>Spreathink ST=??% <br>Situational Complexity SCI=?? | ||
|dates= | |dates=2008-2012 | ||
|link=[[. | |link=[[Media:ERMIS_Paper_310712.pdf |Download Report]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
The ''' | The '''Krasoxwria SDDP 2012 Ayios Amvrosios''' [[Structured Democratic Dialogue Process]] has been conducted in the context of a series of [[Local Development Pilot Projects]] an EU funded endeavor implemented by the [[Cyprus Academy of Public Administration]]on 21 Feb 2012. In most of these SDDPs, FWC Facilitators are called to either facilitate or support. | ||
==Executive Summary== | ==Executive Summary== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) of the first workshop was: </u><br> | <u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) of the first workshop was: </u><br> | ||
'''" | '''"Ποιά εμπόδια πρέπει να ξεπεραστούν για την ανάπτυξη των Κρασοχωρίων? "''' | ||
In response to the TQ, the | In response to the TQ, the 26 participants came up with 71 challenges, which were categorized in 8 clusters. Following the voting process, χχ ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:TAX_image_VAT_Merging__1st_SDDP.png|Influence tree | [[File:TAX_image_VAT_Merging__1st_SDDP.png|Influence tree for TQ.|700px]] | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==Gallery== | ==Gallery== | ||
<gallery perrow="6"> | <gallery perrow="6"> | ||
File:Krasoxwria_20200221_01.JPG | File:Krasoxwria_20200221_01.JPG | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:45, 22 September 2022
|
The Krasoxwria SDDP 2012 Ayios Amvrosios Structured Democratic Dialogue Process has been conducted in the context of a series of Local Development Pilot Projects an EU funded endeavor implemented by the Cyprus Academy of Public Administrationon 21 Feb 2012. In most of these SDDPs, FWC Facilitators are called to either facilitate or support.
Executive Summary
During the period 7-19 November, the project team , in collaboration with the Cyprus Academy of Public Administration ( CAPA ), conducted three consultation meetings - workshops with all interested stakeholders in-order to analyze the smooth transition of merging the Services provided by the Department of Inland Revenue (i.e., TAX) and the Value Added Tax Services (VAT). The aim of the first SDDP workshop was to identify the Challenges that people and organizational structured would face during this transition.
The Triggering Question (TQ) of the first workshop was:
"Ποιά εμπόδια πρέπει να ξεπεραστούν για την ανάπτυξη των Κρασοχωρίων? "
In response to the TQ, the 26 participants came up with 71 challenges, which were categorized in 8 clusters. Following the voting process, χχ ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.
Gallery
According to the participants of this workshop, the challenges that appear to be the most influential were:
- Challenge
The workshop was mainly facilitated by Marios Michaelides and Yiannis Laouris.
In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported their satisfaction that they had the opportunity to exchange ideas regarding the challenges and got engaged for the follow-up workshop to define the expectations.
