SDDP Civil Society Dialogue Options: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(change of template)
(added citation)
 
Line 24: Line 24:




<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was</u> <br>
==[[Triggering Question]] (TQ)==
'''In the context of the overall objective of bridging the gap between the two communities: What short- to medium term goals in your opinion if achieved would contribute significantly to the above objective?'''<br>
'''In the context of the overall objective of bridging the gap between the two communities: What short- to medium term goals in your opinion if achieved would contribute significantly to the above objective?'''<br>


Line 38: Line 38:




==Mapping==
The Knowledge Management Team later structured an additional 15 ideas to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
The Knowledge Management Team later structured an additional 15 ideas to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>


Line 54: Line 55:
In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented, therefore they communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br>   
In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented, therefore they communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br>   


==Reports==
The full report can be downloaded from [[Media:CSD_SDDP_PeaceRevival_Report_final.pdf| here]]. <br>
The full report can be downloaded from [[Media:CSD_SDDP_PeaceRevival_Report_final.pdf| here]]. <br>
The full paper is available from [http://www.springerlink.com/content/tu2870qnx285210u/fulltext.pdf Open Access]
The full paper is available from [http://www.springerlink.com/content/tu2870qnx285210u/fulltext.pdf Open Access]
* Laouris, Y., Erel, A., Michaelides, M., Damdelen, M., Taraszow, T., Dagli, I., Laouri, R. and Christakis, A. (2009). Exploring Options for Enhancement of Social Dialogue Between the Turkish and Greek Communities in Cyprus Using the Structured Dialogic Design Process. Syst Pract Action Res 22:361–381.