R-I-Peers - Athens Virtual SDD Obstacles we face when designing and implementing GEPs: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|dates=2021 | |dates=2021 | ||
|LeadFacilitator=[[Yiannis Laouris ]] | |LeadFacilitator=[[Yiannis Laouris ]] | ||
|AsFacilitator=[[Marcus | |AsFacilitator=[[Kevin Dye]] <br> [[Marcus Hallside]] | ||
|author=[[Jordan Kent]] | |author=[[Jordan Kent]] | ||
|editor= [[Yiannis Laouris ]] | |editor= [[Yiannis Laouris ]] | ||
|total_duration= | |total_duration=6.5 hrs | ||
|stats=Participants=15 <br> Number of ideas=54 <br>Number of Clusters=11 <br> Ideas received Votes=26 <br> Ideas on MAP R=11 <br> Spreadthink ST= | |stats=Participants=15 <br> Number of ideas=54 <br>Number of Clusters=11 <br> Ideas received Votes=26 <br> Ideas on MAP R=11 <br> Spreadthink ST=43% | ||
|isbn=ISBN | |isbn=ISBN | ||
|link=[[Media:R-I PEERS D6.7 Spain Greece MLW FINAL 20220302.pdf|Download Report]] | |link=[[Media:R-I PEERS D6.7 Spain Greece MLW FINAL 20220302.pdf|Download Report]] | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
In response to the TQ, the | In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 54 ideas. | ||
A percentage of 54% of the total number of ideas, that is | A percentage of 54% of the total number of ideas, that is 26 ideas, received votes, thus ST was 43% | ||
==Clustering Voting Structuring== | |||
# Cluster Commitment | # Cluster Commitment | ||
Line 55: | Line 57: | ||
# Cluster Research | # Cluster Research | ||
Following the voting process, | Following the voting process, 26 ideas received one or more votes and 11 were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | ||
Line 64: | Line 66: | ||
According to the participants of this workshop, the practices that appear to be the most influential were: <br> | According to the participants of this workshop, the practices that appear to be the most influential were: <br> | ||
* 31: Failure to assess the interconnection with other issues | |||
* 33: GEPs are not yet obligatory under law (as they should have probably mean) | |||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
[http://ripeers.eu/ R&I PEERS] | [http://ripeers.eu/ R&I PEERS] |
Revision as of 05:40, 19 August 2022
|
Executive Summary
TThe Mutual Learning Workshop "What are the best practices to overcome problems, barriers, issues when implementing your GEPs?" was organised virtually (Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the consequent sanctions and difficulties in traveling abroad, the consortium of the project decided to deliver the workshop virtually) over 4 sessions using Zoom on the dates shown below. The Greek partner, ISOTITA has sent the invitation 6 weeks before the event to many national, some international and all partners.
- 16/12/2021 (30 min) Preparatory for introductions and to explain the process
- 13/1/2022 (2 hrs) Collection and Clarification of contributions
- 20/1/2022 (2 hrs) Clustering
- 27/1/2022 (2 hrs) Structuring and Road Mapping
Yiannis Laouris, from the Cyprus Neuroscience & Technology Institute (CNTI) has served as the Facilitator. in the context of the project R&I PEERS funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme,
The workshop, which was realised using the participatory methodology of the Structured Democratic Dialogue (SDD), brought together fifteen (15) experts from the gender equality field representing universities, governmental and scientific bodies as well as enterprises to discuss the existing practices across Gender Equality Plans (GEPs).
Triggering Question (TQ) of the workshop
What barriers or obstacles do we face when designing and implementing GEPs?
In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 54 ideas.
A percentage of 54% of the total number of ideas, that is 26 ideas, received votes, thus ST was 43%
Clustering Voting Structuring
- Cluster Commitment
- Cluster Resources
- Cluster Knowledge-Awareness
- Cluster Conflict with existing HR
- Cluster Inclusion of employees #
- Cluster Evaluation
- Cluster Not evidence-based
- Cluster Environment
- Cluster Beurocracy
- Cluster Insufficient Measures
- Cluster Research
Following the voting process, 26 ideas received one or more votes and 11 were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.
According to the participants of this workshop, the practices that appear to be the most influential were:
- 31: Failure to assess the interconnection with other issues
- 33: GEPs are not yet obligatory under law (as they should have probably mean)