5,712
edits
(Created page with "{{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> |acronym=Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the problématique ...") |
(change of template) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SDD_Report | {{SDD_Report | ||
|acronym=Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the problématique | |acronym= Insafe SDDP: Engaging Educators - Defining the problématique | ||
|book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | |book_image= SDDP_Report_Image.jpg | ||
|report_title= Final Report of SDDP Co-Laboratory "How Do We Engage Educators?" | |report_title= Final Report of SDDP Co-Laboratory "How Do We Engage Educators?" | ||
|Triggering_Question=What are obstacles that prevent us from engaging educators? | |project= [[Cyberethics: Cyprus Safer Internet Center]] | ||
| | |Triggering_Question= What are obstacles that prevent us from engaging educators? | ||
|author= | |location= | ||
|editor=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Tatjana Taraszow]] | |dates= September 17-19, 2007 | ||
|total_duration=4 hours | |LeadFacilitator= | ||
|stats=Participants=20 <br> Number of ideas=70 <br>Number of Clusters= <br> Ideas received Votes=21 <br> Ideas on MAP R=14 <br>Spreathink ST= | |AsFacilitator= | ||
| | |author= | ||
|link=http://www.saferinternet.org | |editor= [[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Tatjana Taraszow]] | ||
|total_duration= 4 hours | |||
|stats= Participants=20 <br> Number of ideas=70 <br>Number of Clusters= <br> Ideas received Votes=21 <br> Ideas on MAP R=14 <br>Spreathink ST= | |||
|isbn= | |||
|link= http://www.saferinternet.org | |||
}} | }} | ||
Part of the [[Getting the Best out of our Insafe Network 2007 Co-Laboratories]]. | |||
==Executive Summary== | ==Executive Summary== | ||
For the first time ever, all Awareness Nodes of the EU Safer Internet project used the Structured Design Dialogue Process (SDDP) during their Insafe Training meeting which took place in Limassol, Cyprus September 17-19, 2007. | For the first time ever, all Awareness Nodes of the EU Safer Internet project used the Structured Design Dialogue Process (SDDP) during their Insafe Training meeting which took place in Limassol, Cyprus September 17-19, 2007. | ||
The two SDDP co-laboratories ‘Engaging Educators’ documented here built on experiences gained from previous relevant training sessions in Bruges and Stockholm as well as the results of the 6-month evaluations (Customer Satisfaction Surveys) performed by the coordinating node. | The two SDDP co-laboratories ‘Engaging Educators’ documented here built on experiences gained from previous relevant training sessions in Bruges and Stockholm as well as the results of the 6-month evaluations (Customer Satisfaction Surveys) performed by the coordinating node. | ||
Two simultaneous running co-laboratories were dealing with the topic of engaging educators. Co-laboratory A explored the weaknesses of the current model of collaboration between nodes and educators, while co-laboratory B envisioned not only ideal means of engaging educators in the Internet Awareness Campaign but also envisioned the ideal collaboration model between nodes and educators. <br> | Two simultaneous running co-laboratories were dealing with the topic of engaging educators. Co-laboratory A explored the weaknesses of the current model of collaboration between nodes and educators, while co-laboratory B envisioned not only ideal means of engaging educators in the Internet Awareness Campaign but also envisioned the ideal collaboration model between nodes and educators. <br> | ||
Line 25: | Line 30: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File: | [[File:Engaging Educators - Defining the problématiqueMap.jpg|center|thumb|upright=3.0|MAP for Insafe SDDP.|Educators – Problématique – Root Cause Map]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
The voting results were used to select factors for the subsequent structuring phase to identify inter-relations among the generated factors. The 14 factors were structured within four levels and are related according to the influence they exert on each other. | The voting results were used to select factors for the subsequent structuring phase to identify inter-relations among the generated factors. The 14 factors were structured within four levels and are related according to the influence they exert on each other. |