4,971
edits
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
[[CYBER KIDS]] has also supported the Tech4Peace project by donating funds and space. It hosted the project for 12 months at its own expense and offered technical know-how at no cost. | [[CYBER KIDS]] has also supported the Tech4Peace project by donating funds and space. It hosted the project for 12 months at its own expense and offered technical know-how at no cost. | ||
===Needs Assessment at the time | ===Needs Assessment at the time=== | ||
As the political situation stood at the time, the Tech4Peace project provided the only form of communication in a bicommunally structured system between the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots. The ban on direct bicommunal contacts and events had consequently raised the Tech4Peace project to a new level of significance. For the first time, citizens engaged in peace building had in fact been able to sustain communication through periods of paralysis of the rapprochement efforts resulting from political reasons and impasse. Through e-mails and chatting they could keep the citizen peace process alive, sustaining motivation through difficult times, while anticipating possible progress on the political level. In fact, a number of bicommunal groups which | As the political situation stood at the time, the Tech4Peace project provided the only form of communication in a bicommunally structured system between the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots. The ban on direct bicommunal contacts and events had consequently raised the Tech4Peace project to a new level of significance. For the first time, citizens engaged in peace building had in fact been able to sustain communication through periods of paralysis of the rapprochement efforts resulting from political reasons and impasse. Through e-mails and chatting they could keep the citizen peace process alive, sustaining motivation through difficult times, while anticipating possible progress on the political level. In fact, a number of bicommunal groups which had been active through regular meetings were then requesting training and participation in the Tech4Peace project as the only means of sustaining communication and continuity for their work. | ||
Using technology to promote communication and peace activities in a conflict area like Cyprus, in which physical access was restricted at the time, was a top priority on the agendas of those who wished to support rapprochment. The need for communication between the two sides was obvious. The fact that hundreds of people who were involved in bicommunal activities | Using technology to promote communication and peace activities in a conflict area like Cyprus, in which physical access was restricted at the time, was a top priority on the agendas of those who wished to support rapprochment. The need for communication between the two sides was obvious. The fact that hundreds of people who were involved in bicommunal activities communicated through emails was to a large degree due to the fact that dozens of people received direct training by Tech4Peace and dozens of others regularly called and requested help, contact information or technical support by Tech4Peace. Volunteers had invested hundreds of hours supporting all those who wished to stay in contact with the other side. It is probably worth noting that Internet was first made available in Cyprus in 1996, thus, the number of people who could capitalize on such technologies was indeed negligible at the time. | ||
It is probably fair to state that peace builders from both sides, viewed the initiative as their virtual "office" which provided them support at all levels. | It is probably fair to state that peace builders from both sides, viewed the initiative as their virtual "office" which provided them support at all levels. | ||
Moreover, a new Coordinating Group | Moreover, a new Coordinating Group, led by [[Dinos Lordos]] had been formed in each respective community which was making full use of the group e-mailing system that was set up in the context of the initiative. The members of the Coordinating Group were working with their respective groups to introduce them in Tech4Peace and encourage them to use and benefit from its infrastructure. In that context, sustaining and further developing the project had far reaching repercussions for the cause of peace in Cyprus, particularly by way of sustaining citizen involvement, in spite of the periodic political odds. | ||
The facilities made available by Tech4Peace did not entail only a means of communication, but also a hi-tech type of infrastructure which could be used for a vast range of projects and activities. In that sense, the need and also the opportunity of the project was to optimize its utilization by adding informational content to the system and inviting citizens to utilize it efficiently and effectively. | The facilities made available by Tech4Peace did not entail only a means of communication, but also a hi-tech type of infrastructure, which could be used for a vast range of projects and activities. In that sense, the need and also the opportunity of the project was to optimize its utilization by adding informational content to the system and inviting citizens to utilize it efficiently and effectively. | ||
In addition to providing a sustainable means of communication, internet | |||
In addition to providing a sustainable means of communication, internet exposed peacebuilders from both communities to global information. The fact, for example, that within a few minutes, one could access first-hand information on most recent issues (e.g. EU-Cyprus relations, Palestinean-Israel disputes etc.) or read about the mission and activities of all types of organizations (e.g. Peace Centers, funding organizations, government agencies etc. world-wide). | |||
==Project Description, Sustainability, Impact and bicommunality== | ==Project Description, Sustainability, Impact and bicommunality== |