CAN CY SDD 6 & 8 Jun 2023

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Revision as of 05:25, 17 October 2023 by Laouris (talk | contribs) (Created page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
CAN CY SDD 6 & 8 Jun 2023
Project Civic Action Now in Cyprus
Dates 6 & 8 Jun 2023
Author(s) Yiannis Laouris
Editor(s) Ilke Dagli
Total Duration 2 Full days
Statistics Participants=xx
Number of ideas=xx
Number of Clusters=x
Ideas received Votes= x indicating Spreathink = x%
Ideas on MAP R= x
Download Download Report



Executive Summary

This SDD was implemented in the context of the Civic Action Now in Cyprus project.

The results presented here are from a virtual Structured Democratic Dialogues (SDDs) that was organized and managed from Cyprus between March and June 2022. The aim was to he participants from the five countries for a full-scale week-long training in SDD facilitation that took place in June 2022. The representatives from the participating countries were prepared on how to apply SDDs to address local challenges in their respective rural communities.

This first part of the SDD training took place between May and June 2022. It was organized as a sequence of 5 weekly Zoom meetings. The Triggering Question was: In the context of your work, what are obstacles that prevent efficient stakeholders’ dialogues?

The participants produced xx ideas, which were clustered into x categories.

Visual Overview of List of Clusters

Clusters


Visual Overview of Mapping

After voting for their top 5, 17 ideas received votes (indicating Spreathink = 40%), and 7 were structured.


Influence MAP

The following ideas made it to the root of the tree:
Idea 28: (9 Votes) Lack/absence of a clear common goal for the group to work on
Idea 19: (7 Votes) Moderator/facilitator
Idea 60: (4 Votes) Inconsistency and incompatibility between group members (age, educational level and experience, etc.)
Idea 21: (4 Votes) Conflict of interest
Idea 52: (3 Votes) Not knowing the contents of the topics well
Idea 47: (3 Votes) Some members might not have the appropriate knowledge and the skills for stakeholders’ dialogue