AER-V SDDP of the International Facilitators Training School 2022: Difference between revisions
(Delete) |
(code) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> | |||
|acronym=SDDP Local Authorities Troodos <!-- Append to variable acronym the content acronym of the sdd report --> | |||
|book_image= SDDP_Report_Image.jpg <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the content--> | |||
|report_title=Mechanisms that ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services | |||
|Triggering_Question=What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services? | |||
|project=[[CARDIAC]] | |||
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Georgina Siitta Achilleos]] | |||
|editor= [[Marios Michaeldes]] <br> [[Marios Constantinides]] <br> [[Vados Savvides]] <br> [[Cyprus Academy of Public Administration]] | |||
|total_duration=2 days | |||
|stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of ideas=55 <br>Number of Clusters=18 <br> Ideas received Votes=23 <br> Ideas on MAP R=19 <br>Spreathink ST=40% | |||
|dates=16th - 17th February 2010 | |||
|link=[http://accessible-assistive-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com/file/view/Cardiac_Pafos_SDD_A4_20110218.pdf/406905392/Cardiac_Pafos_SDD_A4_20110218.pdf Download Report] | |||
}} | |||
==Executive Summary== | |||
This report has been developed in the context of the [[CARDIAC]] project (FP7 - Coordinating Action: Grant Agreement 248582). The goal of the project is to create a platform that can bring together the various stakeholders in the area of accessible and assistive ICT with a view to identifying Research & Development gaps and emerging trends and generating a research agenda roadmap. | |||
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br> | |||
'''What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?''' | |||
In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br> | |||
<br> | |||
[[File:Cardiac_I_map.jpg|thumb|center|upright=2.0|alt=MAP for CARDIAC III.|Influence tree on the mechanisms that would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services.]] | |||
<br> | |||
According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristics appear to be the most influential were: <br> | |||
* Mechanism #1, Big delay in decision making from the governmental side | |||
The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> <br> | |||
The workshop was facilitated by [[Elena Aristodemou]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]), [[Aleco Christakis]] and [[Georgina Siitta Achilleos]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]). | |||
==External Links== | |||
* [http://www.cardiac-eu.org/about/index.htm CARDIAC Website] | |||
[[Category:Future Worlds Center Projects]] | |||
[[Category:Projects with SDD]] | |||
[[Category:SDDP (Society)]] | |||
[[Category:SDDP (Technology)]] | |||
Revision as of 01:51, 16 June 2022
|
Executive Summary
This report has been developed in the context of the CARDIAC project (FP7 - Coordinating Action: Grant Agreement 248582). The goal of the project is to create a platform that can bring together the various stakeholders in the area of accessible and assistive ICT with a view to identifying Research & Development gaps and emerging trends and generating a research agenda roadmap.
The Triggering Question (TQ) was
What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?
In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.
According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristics appear to be the most influential were:
- Mechanism #1, Big delay in decision making from the governmental side
The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.
The workshop was facilitated by Elena Aristodemou (CNTI), Aleco Christakis and Georgina Siitta Achilleos (CNTI).
