SDDP Act Beyond Borders Vision Building in Larnaca in 2010: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|report_title=Vision of "what ought to be" | |report_title=Vision of "what ought to be" | ||
|Triggering_Question=What are descriptions of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians? | |Triggering_Question=What are descriptions of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians? | ||
|project=[[]] | |project=[[Act Beyond Borders]] | ||
| | |Facilitators=Dr. [[Aleco Christakis]] <br> Dr. [[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> Dr.Antonis Loizou <br> Ms. Maria Kyprianou | ||
|editor= | |||
|total_duration= | |total_duration=6 days (whole SDD co-laboratory) | ||
|stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of | |stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of Ideas=69 <br>Number of Clusters=10 <br> Ideas received Votes=6 <br> Ideas on MAP R= <br>Spreathink ST= | ||
|dates= | |dates=24th - 31th July 2010 | ||
|link= | |link= | ||
==Executive Summary== | ==Executive Summary== | ||
This report | This report was prepared in the context of the project “Human Rights and Reconciliation – Civil Society Acts Beyond Borders’. | ||
The participants of the SDD co-laboratory are: | |||
Revision as of 05:09, 7 March 2013
{{SDD_Report
|acronym=SDDP Act Beyond Borders Vision Building (Larnaca 2010)
|book_image= Act_Beyond_Borders.png
|report_title=Vision of "what ought to be"
|Triggering_Question=What are descriptions of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians?
|project=Act Beyond Borders
|Facilitators=Dr. Aleco Christakis
Dr. Yiannis Laouris
Dr.Antonis Loizou
Ms. Maria Kyprianou
|editor=
|total_duration=6 days (whole SDD co-laboratory)
|stats=Participants=21
Number of Ideas=69
Number of Clusters=10
Ideas received Votes=6
Ideas on MAP R=
Spreathink ST=
|dates=24th - 31th July 2010
|link=
Executive Summary
This report was prepared in the context of the project “Human Rights and Reconciliation – Civil Society Acts Beyond Borders’.
The participants of the SDD co-laboratory are:
The Triggering Question (TQ) was
What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?
In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.
According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristics appear to be the most influential were:
- Mechanism #1, Big delay in decision making from the governmental side
The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.
The workshop was facilitated by Elena Aristodemou (CNTI), Aleco Christakis and Georgina Siitta Achilleos (CNTI).
