SDDP Act Beyond Borders Vision Building in Larnaca in 2010: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->
{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->
   |acronym=SDDP Act Beyond Borders Vision Building (Larnaca 2010)            <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
   |acronym=SDDP Local Authorities Troodos                      <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
|book_image= Act_Beyond_Borders.png  <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the content-->
|book_image= Act_Beyond_Borders.png  <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the content-->
|report_title=Vision of "what ought to be"
|report_title=Mechanisms that ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services
|Triggering_Question=What are descriptions of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians?
|Triggering_Question=What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?
|project=[[Act Beyond Borders]]
|project=
|Facilitators=Dr. [[Aleco Christakis]] <br> Dr. [[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> Dr.Antonis Loizou <br> Ms. Maria Kyprianou
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Georgina Siitta Achilleos]]
|editor=
|editor= [[Marios Michaeldes]] <br> [[Marios Constantinides]] <br> [[Vados Savvides]] <br> [[Cyprus Academy of Public Administration]]
|total_duration=6 days (whole SDD co-laboratory)
|total_duration=2 days
|stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of Ideas=69 <br>Number of Clusters=10 <br> Ideas received Votes=6 <br> Ideas on MAP R=  <br>Spreathink  ST=  
|stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of ideas=55 <br>Number of Clusters=18 <br> Ideas received Votes=23 <br> Ideas on MAP R=19 <br>Spreathink  ST=40%
|dates=24th - 31th July 2010
|dates=16th - 17th February 2010
|link=
|link=
}}
 


==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==
Line 17: Line 17:


==Participants==
==Participants==


<table border="1" width="60%">
<table border="1" width="60%">

Revision as of 05:31, 7 March 2013

{{SDD_Report

  |acronym=SDDP Local Authorities Troodos                      

|book_image= Act_Beyond_Borders.png |report_title=Mechanisms that ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services |Triggering_Question=What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services? |project= |author=Yiannis Laouris
Georgina Siitta Achilleos |editor= Marios Michaeldes
Marios Constantinides
Vados Savvides
Cyprus Academy of Public Administration |total_duration=2 days |stats=Participants=21
Number of ideas=55
Number of Clusters=18
Ideas received Votes=23
Ideas on MAP R=19
Spreathink ST=40% |dates=16th - 17th February 2010 |link=


Executive Summary

This report was prepared in the context of the project “Human Rights and Reconciliation – Civil Society Acts Beyond Borders’.

Participants

Name
Job Title
Abeer George Youssef Awwad (Palestiniam) Student
Aia Harel (Islaeli) Student
Anat Romberg (Israeli) Hanoar Haoved Vehalomed -

Youth organization

Dar Nadler (Islaeli) Public Administrator
Dar Nadler (Israeli) Hanoar Haoved Vehalomed -

Youth organization

Dar Nadler (Islaeli) Public Administrator
Dar Nadler (Islaeli) Public Administrator
Dar Nadler (Islaeli) Public Administrator
Dar Nadler (Islaeli) Public Administrator

The Triggering Question (TQ) was
What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?

In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received oe or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.


MAP for CARDIAC III.
Influence tree on the mechanisms that would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services.


According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristics appear to be the most influential were:

  • Mechanism #1, Big delay in decision making from the governmental side

The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.

The workshop was facilitated by Elena Aristodemou (CNTI), Aleco Christakis and Georgina Siitta Achilleos (CNTI).



External Links